16-02-2026 21:25
Andreas Millinger
Good evening,failed to find an idea for this fungu
08-12-2025 17:37
Lothar Krieglsteiner
20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened
17-02-2026 17:26
Nicolas Suberbielle
Bonjour à tous, Je recherche cette publication :
15-02-2026 04:32
Tomaz Vucko
One more specimen that is giving me some descent a
17-02-2026 13:41
Isabelle CharissouBonjour, est-ce que quelqu'un pourrait me fournir
16-02-2026 18:34
Thierry Blondelle
Bonjour,La micro de cet anamorphe de Hercospora su
16-02-2026 17:14
Joanne TaylorLast week we published the following paper where w
16-02-2026 16:53
Isabelle CharissouBonjour, quelqu'un pourrait-il me transmettre un
Bonjour:Asques x8, croziers+, IKI + BB
Spores 9,50 - 11,80 / 3,00 - 3,90 Q= 2,60 - 3,65
Cordialement
Hi Leandro,
this looks much like M. uda for me. Did you test the KOH-reaction? This should be positive in M. uda.
Regards from Lothar
Paraphyses without reaction KOH 3 %
Best regards
Hello,
so this should be Mollisia rivularis then, but the spore size doesn't fit and also M. rivularis should have a few oil drops inseide the spores.
I also came across collections, which in all respects looked like M. rivularis, but had the spores of M. pulviniformis (= M. uda ss. auct.).
because of these intemediate collections I hesitate to describe the Mollisia pulviniformis as new species, and want to wait on molecular data from more collections, especially from M. rivularis.
I have prepared a paper on the submers species of Mollisia, but it is not ready yet.
best regards,
Andreas