Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

25-03-2026 13:54

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Does anyone know where I could download Paoletti's

25-03-2026 15:46

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Je sollicite de l'aide pour cette récol

25-03-2026 15:06

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me confirm

25-03-2026 10:35

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello,I collected this species growing on a dead b

24-03-2026 19:59

William Slosse William Slosse

Hello everyone,On 23/03/26, I found the following

21-03-2026 15:13

Lepista Zacarias

Hello everyone, Does any one know of any literatu

24-03-2026 21:37

Elisabeth Stöckli

Bonsoir,Sur bois (tronc) très pourri de conifère

24-03-2026 21:07

Ethan Crenson

Hello all, A friend collected this asco in a wood

23-03-2026 20:16

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o

24-03-2026 15:44

Åge Oterhals

I hope someone can confirm the name of this collec

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Hyaloscypha on decorticated hardwood
Enrique Rubio, 22-01-2014 19:47
Enrique Rubio

Hi again


I'd like to know your opinion about these small (up to 0.7-0.9 mm) saucer-shaped subhyaline/greyish, minutely hairy ascomata, that grew on decorticated hardwood dragged by a stream.


The asci are IKI negative even after KOH pret., with croziers and the hairs are small and pointed.


I think in a Hyaloscypha species but I don't know a species that fits well with this collection.


Have you some idea?

  • message #27006
  • message #27006
  • message #27006
  • message #27006
  • message #27006
Hans-Otto Baral, 22-01-2014 20:28
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hyaloscypha on decorticated hardwood
If the asci were simple-septate it would be quercicola.

I looked in Huhtinen and there is nothing that matches this

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 22-01-2014 20:29
Enrique Rubio
Re : Hyaloscypha on decorticated hardwood

HI Zotto


But the asci are clearly with croziers...

Hans-Otto Baral, 22-01-2014 21:54
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hyaloscypha on decorticated hardwood
Yes, therefore it is a species not included in Huhtinen's monograph.