Francesco Doveri, dans la monographie écrit a propos de Trichobolus: "The is no monograph on Trichobolus, but it has been tracted in depth by Krimbough & Korf (1967)". A ma connaissance, aucune publié des travaux sur la biologie moléculaire de Trichobolus. 
Dans ma bibliothèque, j'ai les travaux suivants:

Kimbrough - 1966: The structure and development of Trichobolus zukalii. Mycologia 58 (2): 289-306. [PDF]

Kimbrough & Korf - 1967: A Synopsis of the Genera and Species of the Tribe Theleboleae (= Pseudoascoboleae). American Journal of Botany 54 (1): 9-23. [PDF]

Samuelson & Kimbrough - 1978: Asci of Pezizales V: The apical apparatus of Trichobolus zukalii. Mycologia 70 (6): 1191-1200. [PDF]

Si vous êtes intéressé je peux envoyer ces emplois par e-mail,

Alessio

Bonjour Nicolas,

Il y a de la litterature sur Trichobolus dans cette site:

http://herba.msu.ru/departments/mycology/staff/pvp.html?

Amicalement

Hermine

From Myconet - current version

Thelebolales P.F, Cannon 2001
Thelebolaceae (Brumm.) Eckblad 1968
Antarctomyces Stchigel & Guarro
Ascophanus Boud.
Ascozonus (Renny) E.C. Hansen
Caccobius Kimbr.
Coprobolus Cain & Kimbr.
Coprotiella Jeng & J.C. Krug
Coprotus Korf ex Korf & Kimbr.
Dennisiopsis Subram. & Chandras.
Leptokalpion Brumm.
Mycoarctium K. Jain & Cain
Ochotrichobolus Kimbr. & Korf
Pseudascozonus Brumm.
Ramgea Brumm.
Thelebolus Tode
Trichobolus (Sacc.) Kimbr. & Cain

So surprising that Mycobank/Dict.of F. is not up to date on this issue

cheers

Thomas

J'ai finalement trouvé les articles que je cherchais. Hansen e Pfister (2006) écrire: 

On the other hand, Thelebolus and related genera (Thelebolaceae) were excluded from the Pezizales based on ascoma development and ascus structure (e.g. Samuelson and Kimbrough 1978) and molecular phylogenetic studies (Landvik et al 1998). These taxa now are considered as allied with the Leotiomycetes.

Whang et al. (2006) cependant, écrivez: 
The order [Thelebolales] might not be monophyletic and its position in the Leotiomycetes should be regarded as a temporary treatment until sufficient proof becomes available.

Cooke & Barr - 1964: The taxonomix position of the genus Thelebolus. Mycologia 56 (5): 763-769. [PDF]
Hansen & Pfister - 2006: Systematic of the Pezizomycetes: the operculate Discomycetes. Mycologia 98 (6): 1029-1040. [PDF]
Krimbough - 1970: Current trends in the classification of Discomycetes. Botanical Review 36 (2): 91-161. [PDF]
Landvik et al. - 1997: Phylogenetic and structural studies in the Thelebolaceae (Ascomycota). Mycoscience 39 (1): 49-56. [PDF]
Samuelson & Kimbrough - 1978: Asci of Pezizales. IV. The apical apparatus of Thelebolus. Botanical Gazette 139 (3): 346-361 [PDF]
Whang et al. - 2006: Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Leotiomycetes based on rDNA data. Mycologia 98 (6): 1065-1075. [PDF]

Dear Nicolas,

You might also wish to read this paper:

KRUG,J. C. 1973. An enlarged concept of Trichobolus (Thelebolaceae, Pezizales) based on a new eight-
spored species. Can. J. Bot. 51 : 1497-1501.

It has a key to four species.

Dave
?