15-10-2025 16:39
Edvin Johannesen
These tiny (0.2-0.6 mm), white, pulvinate apotheci
23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623
03-10-2025 13:44
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde on Populus
13-10-2025 19:05
Louis DENYBonjour forumSur tronc décortiqué de feuillu x,
11-10-2025 20:27
Marcel Heyligen
Found on a barked branch, 14 mm in diameter, of Ro
09-10-2025 22:14
S. RebeccaWe just had the Bavarian Mycology Conference in Au
10-10-2025 00:49
Ethan CrensonHello all, This was found last weekend on a hardw
lachnum literature
Baeza Yajaira,
17-04-2012 05:11
hello averybody im looking for this paper, i hope someone has it, i'll appreciate it =) Haines JH. Studies in Hyaloscyphaceae VI: the genus Lachnum (Ascommycetes) of the Guayana Highlands. Nova Hedwigia. 1992;54:97–112.
thank you so much
Hans-Otto Baral,
17-04-2012 08:29
Re : lachnum literature
I have this paper but not in a digital version. Let's first see if someone has it.
Zotto
Zotto
Stip Helleman,
17-04-2012 08:52
Re : lachnum literature
I am sorry, that is the one I am missing too!
Stip
Stip
Baeza Yajaira,
17-04-2012 16:10
Re : lachnum literature
no problem! thank you so much anyway Zotto and Stip. i am waiting if somebody else have it :D !!!
Greetings :D
Greetings :D
Chris Yeates,
17-04-2012 22:44
1992-v54-p97-0001.pdf
Stip Helleman,
17-04-2012 22:47
Re : lachnum literature
Thanks a lot Chris,
Stip
Stip
François Valade,
18-04-2012 11:36
Re : lachnum literature
Thank you Chris.
Note that for the combination page 103, the epithet is badly written. For a neutral name, it must end by -um (fer, fera, ferum)
Lachnum fimbriiferum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Haines
= Dasyscyphys fimbriifer (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Sacc.
= Peziza fimbriifera Berk. & M.A. Curtis
same for neblinensis, for a neutral name it should be Lachnum neblinense Haines
but Lachnum patena is right because patena is a substantive. I read Lachnum patinum in Wang, Y.-z.(2003). A new species and a new record of Lachnum from Taiwan.Mycotaxon 87:139. it is clearly wrong.
Note that for the combination page 103, the epithet is badly written. For a neutral name, it must end by -um (fer, fera, ferum)
Lachnum fimbriiferum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Haines
= Dasyscyphys fimbriifer (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Sacc.
= Peziza fimbriifera Berk. & M.A. Curtis
same for neblinensis, for a neutral name it should be Lachnum neblinense Haines
but Lachnum patena is right because patena is a substantive. I read Lachnum patinum in Wang, Y.-z.(2003). A new species and a new record of Lachnum from Taiwan.Mycotaxon 87:139. it is clearly wrong.
Baeza Yajaira,
18-04-2012 16:35
Re : lachnum literature
thank you so much Chris! :D