04-11-2025 09:07
Josep Torres
Hello.A suspected Hymenoscyphus sprouting on a thi
04-11-2025 12:43
Edvin Johannesen
Hi! One more found on old Populus tremula log in O
03-11-2025 21:34
Edvin Johannesen
These tiny (0.4-0.5 mm diam.), whitish, short-stip
28-10-2025 15:37
Carl FarmerI'd be grateful for any suggestions for this strik
03-11-2025 16:30
Hans-Otto Baral
Hello I want to ask you if you have found this ye
28-10-2025 19:33
Nicolas Suberbielle
Bonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre avis sur cette r
lachnum literature
Baeza Yajaira,
17-04-2012 05:11
hello averybody im looking for this paper, i hope someone has it, i'll appreciate it =) Haines JH. Studies in Hyaloscyphaceae VI: the genus Lachnum (Ascommycetes) of the Guayana Highlands. Nova Hedwigia. 1992;54:97–112.
thank you so much
Hans-Otto Baral,
17-04-2012 08:29
Re : lachnum literature
I have this paper but not in a digital version. Let's first see if someone has it.
Zotto
Zotto
Stip Helleman,
17-04-2012 08:52
Re : lachnum literature
I am sorry, that is the one I am missing too!
Stip
Stip
Baeza Yajaira,
17-04-2012 16:10
Re : lachnum literature
no problem! thank you so much anyway Zotto and Stip. i am waiting if somebody else have it :D !!!
Greetings :D
Greetings :D
Chris Yeates,
17-04-2012 22:44
1992-v54-p97-0001.pdf
Stip Helleman,
17-04-2012 22:47
Re : lachnum literature
Thanks a lot Chris,
Stip
Stip
François Valade,
18-04-2012 11:36
Re : lachnum literature
Thank you Chris.
Note that for the combination page 103, the epithet is badly written. For a neutral name, it must end by -um (fer, fera, ferum)
Lachnum fimbriiferum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Haines
= Dasyscyphys fimbriifer (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Sacc.
= Peziza fimbriifera Berk. & M.A. Curtis
same for neblinensis, for a neutral name it should be Lachnum neblinense Haines
but Lachnum patena is right because patena is a substantive. I read Lachnum patinum in Wang, Y.-z.(2003). A new species and a new record of Lachnum from Taiwan.Mycotaxon 87:139. it is clearly wrong.
Note that for the combination page 103, the epithet is badly written. For a neutral name, it must end by -um (fer, fera, ferum)
Lachnum fimbriiferum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Haines
= Dasyscyphys fimbriifer (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Sacc.
= Peziza fimbriifera Berk. & M.A. Curtis
same for neblinensis, for a neutral name it should be Lachnum neblinense Haines
but Lachnum patena is right because patena is a substantive. I read Lachnum patinum in Wang, Y.-z.(2003). A new species and a new record of Lachnum from Taiwan.Mycotaxon 87:139. it is clearly wrong.
Baeza Yajaira,
18-04-2012 16:35
Re : lachnum literature
thank you so much Chris! :D