28-11-2025 16:45
Nogueira HéctorNovember 23, 2025 Requejo de Sanabria (León) SPAI
25-11-2025 14:24
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522
17-09-2025 10:50
Heather MerryleesHi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif
27-11-2025 15:41
Thomas LæssøeSpores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;
27-11-2025 12:01
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727
27-11-2025 11:46
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918
27-11-2025 11:31
Thomas LæssøeCollectors notes: Immersed ascomata, erumpent thro
23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623
26-11-2025 18:13
Jason Karakehian
The entire run of Mycotaxon is now available throu
I do not want to overuse, but I still need two articles.Huhtinnen & Spooner (2003) - A redisposition of Ascophanus tityrii Velen.
Kew Bulletin 58 (3) 749-757
Kimbrough (1970) - Segregates of Ascophanus, Coprotus VS. Leporina.
Taxon 19 (5)779 -?
Who can help? Thank you Peter
I am still looking for this first article myself but i will send you another file on the tityrii species
Cheers.
Stip
Seppo and Spooner have wrote two articles on Unguiculella tityrii.
I attach two articles.
Beñat
Huhtinen-amp-Spooner-Ascophanus-tityrii-0001.pdf
last one sent to Peter (850 ko). you can requests it.
Amitiés
Françosi
Thanks again for your effort, Benat, Stib and Francosi, Friends of the Ascomycetes.
Then just one question. Does any of you have one species, which today is still determined by the names Ascophanus? From my knowledge, the species should be deleted. The former collective genus is now merged into many other genres.
What do you say to that?
Peter
PS: Zotto doubts on the nature of belonging to the genus Unguiculella tityrii, since the typical drop in oil de spores lacking.