Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

02-01-2016 17:35

Andreas Gminder Andreas Gminder

Bonjour, avant que je scan tout l'ouvrage je voud

04-01-2016 11:27

Chris Johnson

Good morningFound on rotten wood of unknown specie

06-11-2015 21:14

Mlcoch Patrik Mlcoch Patrik

Good day, I would like ask about determinated thi

03-01-2016 13:54

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

found yesterday near Stuttgart (Ludwigsburg-Poppen

02-01-2016 23:07

Patrice TANCHAUD

Bonjour,récolte sur bouleaux encore debout. Spore

03-01-2016 09:29

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

Happy new year forum, I need :  Matzer, M.; Haf

02-01-2016 10:11

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Hi everybody,first of all I wish you all a Happy N

02-01-2016 19:55

Elisabeth Stöckli

Bonsoir,Récolte sur feuille de Hedera au sol:Apot

02-01-2016 12:02

Hans-Otto Baral Hans-Otto Baral

Hellodoes anybody have this literature?Cenangiopsi

01-01-2016 21:07

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Probablement une banalité mais j'aimerais avoir v

« < 974 975 976 977 978 > »
Capronia
Gernot Friebes, 05-07-2010 22:47
Hi,

again a pyreno. :)

It's a Capronia which I found on the underside of a decorticated branch of Fagus sylvatica lying on the ground together with Mollisia spec. and Orbilia delicatula. According to the paper by Müller et al. this find should be around coronata/pilosella. There is also C. moravica but I think that for this species the form and the size of the spores don't fit too well, neither does the original description by Petrak or the description by Munk.
I think that C. coronata and C. pilosella fit better but my problem is that I don't know how to distinguish these two species. Both have setae around the ostiole and the size of the ascospores is quite similar...
The size of the ascospores of my find is 12-13,5(15) x 4-4,5 µm and they are three-septate. The ascomata were really tiny with a diameter of some 100 µm and apparently smooth until you see them under the microscope. The asci are 8-spored.

Best wishes,

Gernot
  • message #12222
Gernot Friebes, 05-07-2010 22:50
Re:Capronia
ascomata and setae (scale=10 µm):

edit: one scale on a photo was wrong, I changed it.
  • message #12223
Gernot Friebes, 05-07-2010 22:52
Re:Capronia
micros (scale=10 µm):

  • message #12224
Hans-Otto Baral, 05-07-2010 23:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re:Capronia
Hi Gernot

a bad genus which you try to work on :-/

At least you can try the Lugol reaction. In our (Guy's and mine) experience many Capronias react hemiamyloid (red, blue after KOH) in their ascus gel, but not all, and not all in the same intensity. Regrettably, the literature is quite empty concerning this feature (because of the usage of Melzer).

Zotto
Thomas Læssøe, 06-07-2010 10:16
Re:Capronia
Untereiner (e.g. 1997, Mycologia 89(1): 120-131) synonymize C. moravica with C. pilosella, but apparently has nothing so say on C. coronata. It was not included in the Barr key either (Barr 1991, Mycotaxon 41(2): 419-436). Samuels (in Müller et al.1987) does not discuss his New Zealand taxon in relation to pilosella, but does key it out next to this species with a minor difference in spore dimensions.....
Gernot Friebes, 06-07-2010 17:21
Re:Capronia
Hi,

thanks to both of you!

@Zotto: Unfortunately I didn't try lugol and now there are hardly any ascomata left. But I'll think of it in the future.

@Thomas: The paper by Untereiner is new to me and it's interesting that she synonymizes C. moravica with C. pilosella. I think it's strange that Samuels decribes a new species apparently very close to C. pilosella but doesn't write about how to distinguish them. The key isn't very helpful for this problem either. The only big difference seems to be the anamorph (Cladosporium-like anamorph C. pilosella vs. Exophiala anamorph in C. coronata),

Best wishes,

Gernot