29-08-2025 19:04
Thomas FlammerSpores 21.2 - 26.2 x 8.3 - 11.3 µm - Q: 2.20 - 2.
28-08-2025 17:24
Thomas FlammerI know, that this is not the real topic of this fo
29-08-2025 05:16
Francois Guay
I think I may have found the teleomorph of Dendros
27-08-2025 12:02
Pavol PaloHello dear friendsI would like to ask for sharing
25-08-2025 17:37
François Freléchoux
Bonjour,Nous avons trouvé samedi dernier à l'ét
Ascomycetes 29-03-10
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
30-03-2010 09:59
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
30-03-2010 10:00
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
Another foto.
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
30-03-2010 10:03
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
Spores with Melzer
17,5-18,5 x 7,7-7,9 . Q=2,2-2,4
17,5-18,5 x 7,7-7,9 . Q=2,2-2,4
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
30-03-2010 10:03
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
....
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
30-03-2010 10:04
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
spores with cotton blue
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
30-03-2010 10:05
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
Asci 190-242 x 10-12
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
30-03-2010 10:06
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
.....
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
30-03-2010 10:06
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
...
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
30-03-2010 10:08
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
the spores have also two small drops
Richard Korf,
30-03-2010 14:47
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
Looks like Neolecta vitellina. You show no pseudoparenchyma in any photos, and that is lacking in Neolecta. Was long thought to be a member of Geoglossaceae, but in molecular trees turns up basally close to yeasts, the only ascocarp-producing fungi in that part of the trees
Dick.
Dick.
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
30-03-2010 15:51
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
Thank you very much.
In foto that I see in internet I do not see resemblance apart from the orange colour.
My own sample presents a bowl open in the top.
In foto that I see in internet I do not see resemblance apart from the orange colour.
My own sample presents a bowl open in the top.
Richard Korf,
30-03-2010 17:11
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
I could be very wrong. I did not see the cupulate top in your photos, but now I do. You can eliminate Neolecta by checking the sterile tissues of the stipe, If there is a pseudoparenchyma it is not Neolecta.Your microphotos seem all to be squashes of the hymenium, nothing about the structure of the fungus.
Wow, I just realized you have paraphyses, hence DEFINITELY NOT NEOLECTA! What was I thinking? Getting too old, i guess. Are the spores marked? Looks that way in one cotton blue photo.
Apologetically,
Dick
Wow, I just realized you have paraphyses, hence DEFINITELY NOT NEOLECTA! What was I thinking? Getting too old, i guess. Are the spores marked? Looks that way in one cotton blue photo.
Apologetically,
Dick
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
30-03-2010 18:39
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
Perhaps they is immature Sowerbyella rhenana and has not been created the reticular decoration in the spores.
Richard Korf,
30-03-2010 18:57
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
Possible. The asci all look young, no sign of an operculum or even empty discharged asci that I can see in your photos.
Richard Korf,
30-03-2010 18:57
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
Possible. The asci all look young, no sign of an operculum or even empty discharged asci that I can see in your photos.
jean-marc moingeon,
31-03-2010 08:17
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
Bonjour,
Cela me fait penser à Sowerbyella fagicola récolté l'an dernier par Gilbert Moyne. Il devrait nous en dire plus quand il verra ces messages....
Amicalement
Jean-Marc
Cela me fait penser à Sowerbyella fagicola récolté l'an dernier par Gilbert Moyne. Il devrait nous en dire plus quand il verra ces messages....
Amicalement
Jean-Marc
Gilbert MOYNE,
31-03-2010 11:32
Re:Ascomycetes 29-03-10
En effet, cela ressemble beaucoup à Sowerbyella fagicola.
Voir à ce propos une description illustrée de l'espèce dans Bulletin de la Société mycologique de France par Branislav Peric : BSMF124 (1-2) : 13-24 de 2008.
Gilbert
Voir à ce propos une description illustrée de l'espèce dans Bulletin de la Société mycologique de France par Branislav Peric : BSMF124 (1-2) : 13-24 de 2008.
Gilbert