Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

07-01-2026 10:24

Pezicula sp. on indet. hardwood - 303870019
Danny Newman Danny Newman

Pezicula sp. on indet. hardwood Appalachian Highl

07-01-2026 10:05

cf. Chaetospermum on Xylaria - 303631739
Danny Newman Danny Newman

cf. Chaetospermum on XylariaCosby Campground, Grea

06-01-2026 20:54

Gymnoascus ?
Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour à tous et meilleurs voeux pour cette nouv

02-01-2026 17:43

Spores with a sheath
MARICEL PATINO

Hi there, although I couldn't see the fruitbody, I

04-01-2026 17:45

Pithya cupressina with large apothecia looking like P. vulgaris.
Stephen Martin Mifsud Stephen Martin Mifsud

I was happy to find these orange asmocyetes which

02-01-2026 22:48

Calycina languida ?
éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Je profite de cette nouvelle demand

02-01-2026 19:35

Thysanophora?
William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone,First of all, my best wishes

03-01-2026 13:08

Lichenicolous fungus on Myriolecis spec.
Niek Schrier

Hi all,We found groups of perithecia on a Lecanora

03-01-2026 15:36

Nomenclature
éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour, Pouvez-vous me dire quel est le nom à p

29-12-2025 17:44

Lamprospora ? laquelle ?
Isabelle Charissou

Bonjour,J'aimerais savoir si d'autres personnes au

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Diatrypella tocciaeana
Enrique Rubio, 06-01-2010 18:49
Enrique RubioDear friends:
Is Diatrypella tocciaeana on Alnus bark a good species actually? I can see that the Index Fungorum sinonimize it with D. favacea, but I believe to see very differences with it.
Mny thanks¡
Enrique
Enrique Rubio, 06-01-2010 19:27
Enrique Rubio
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
My collection on Alnus glutinosa bark
  • message #9987
Enrique Rubio, 06-01-2010 19:27
Enrique Rubio
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Spores longer than D. favacea
  • message #9988
Enrique Rubio, 06-01-2010 19:28
Enrique Rubio
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Asci polysporous
  • message #9989
Jacques Fournier, 06-01-2010 20:32
Jacques Fournier
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Enrique;
I agree it is troublesome but since Croxall revised the genus (1950) the situation did not evolve. Based on microscopic and cultural data he synonymized several taxa with D. favacea, regardless of differences in the morphology of stromata he considered related to the texture of host bark.
This should be reevaluated with modern tools but Diatrypaceae is not trendy!
But if you gather enough data supporting the splitting of D. favacea, things may change!
Best wishes,
Jacques
Enrique Rubio, 07-01-2010 17:09
Enrique Rubio
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Many thanks for your advices, Jacques.
The time will say some thing to us...
Enrique