Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

26-04-2025 07:15

Dragiša Savic

Hello everyone,the lichen is Candelariella aurella

28-04-2025 12:51

Thomas Flammer

Substrate: Angelica sylvesrisSpore mass: 8.4 - 11.

14-04-2025 15:11

Lennert Gees

Greetings!For my master's dissertation I work on c

27-04-2025 15:54

Martin Bemmann Martin Bemmann

Can somebody provide this article from a Leningrad

26-04-2025 16:01

Jacques Fournier Jacques Fournier

J'ai le regret d'informer les membres du forum qui

26-04-2025 19:32

Francois Guay Francois Guay

I found these small Arachnopeziza sp. growing on d

25-04-2025 22:48

Gustaf Fredell Gustaf Fredell

Hello,I hope everything is going well. I couple mo

18-04-2025 23:16

Robin Pétermann Robin Pétermann

Bonjour, Voici une probable Mollisia, genre que j

24-04-2025 21:35

Thorben Hülsewig

Hi there,last week i could found this asco on an S

25-04-2025 17:24

Stefan Blaser

Hi everybody, This collection was collected by JÃ

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Rutstroemia firma ou Rutstroemia alni ?
Bernard CLESSE, 18-02-2022 16:40
Bernard CLESSESur brindille morte de feuillu (non identifié mais peut-être d'aulne glutineux ?) au fond d'une vallée.


Dans l'eau, les spores font (sans les appendices) : 20-24x7-8,5 µm et les asques : 150-181x10-15 µm.


Je n'arrive pas à choisir entre Rutstroemia firma et Rutstroemia alni.

Merci pour vos conseils !

Bernard

  • message #71867
  • message #71867
  • message #71867
  • message #71867
  • message #71867
Hans-Otto Baral, 18-02-2022 20:44
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Rutstroemia firma ou Rutstroemia alni ?
Neither of them. I suspect R. bolaris on Carpinus. You must study the ectal excipulum, is it of isodiametrical cells or prismatica?

R. alni has spores *17-24 x 7-9 (matching yours, whereas R. firma has *15-23 x 4.5-6. R. alni occurs with multiguttulate spores as well as with two large and many small LBs. No idea if this has something to say. In R. firma I never saw multiguttulate spores, which are characteristic of R. bolaris.

One reason for R. bolaris is, that you found it now. It is a sprin fungus, though my notes say III-IV. R. alni and R. forma are autumn fungi.

Try to find out the host, with a radial section it is easy to recognize Alnus by the ladder-like perforations that Carpinus does not have.
Bernard CLESSE, 18-02-2022 21:01
Bernard CLESSE
Re : Rutstroemia firma ou Rutstroemia alni ?
Yes Zotto, you are absolutely right. I was too quick in my conclusions and I had forgotten Rutstroemia bolaris which I nevertheless collected several times. Andgelo Mombert also put me back on the right track.

Kind regards,

Bernard
Michel Hairaud, 20-02-2022 21:25
Michel Hairaud
Re : Rutstroemia firma ou Rutstroemia alni ?
Bonsoir, 
Of course I approve R. bolaris . I only want to add that we regularly collect it in Februrary (in West of France) and even earlier than Bernard's find 
Michel
Bernard CLESSE, 20-02-2022 21:30
Bernard CLESSE
Re : Rutstroemia firma ou Rutstroemia alni ?
Grand merci pour ton info sur la phénologie de cette espèce, Michel ! 

Je me rappellerai de cet élément important signalé par Zotto et que tu me confirmes aussi !

Bien amicalement,

Bernard
Michel Hairaud, 20-02-2022 22:15
Michel Hairaud
Re : Rutstroemia firma ou Rutstroemia alni ?
Donc à l'année prochaine même époque, Bernard sur ce forum ? -:) Michel