27-11-2025 12:01
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727
27-11-2025 11:46
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918
17-09-2025 10:50
Heather MerryleesHi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif
29-11-2025 08:40
Andreas Millinger
Hello,on a splintered part of a branch on the grou
28-11-2025 16:45
Nogueira HéctorNovember 23, 2025 Requejo de Sanabria (León) SPAI
25-11-2025 14:24
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522
27-11-2025 15:41
Thomas LæssøeSpores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;
27-11-2025 11:31
Thomas LæssøeCollectors notes: Immersed ascomata, erumpent thro
23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623
26-11-2025 18:13
The entire run of Mycotaxon is now available throu
However, neither Species Fungorum nor Mycobank mentions this species as conspecific with Leptosphaeria acuta or as the anamorph of this species. Ellis & Ellis (1996) mention conidia length for the anamorph of Leptosphaeria acuta which clearly does not refer to Phoma piskorzii (which has much longer conidia).
So apparently the anamorph stage has not yet been established with certainty?
Thanks in advance for your help, Eduard
The above-mentioned papers are available online:
https://www.repository.naturalis.nl/document/569749
http://www.repository.naturalis.nl/document/569779
Thanks for your comment. Yes I did consult this recent Phoma study.
Unfortunately Phoma piskorzii and Leptosphaeria acuta have not been dealt with in this paper.
Eduard
All the best, Eduard
Phoma-SIM72-0001.pdf