09-02-2025 22:51
Yanick BOULANGERBonsoirEst-ce que quelqu'un peut me dire s'il s'ag
01-02-2025 20:32
Andreas Gminder
Hello,today my girlfriend Sylvie found a single ap
06-02-2025 18:11
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Hello, while digging in my fungarium, I found an
07-02-2025 22:28
Yanick BOULANGERBonsoirPetit pyrénomycètes d'environ 1 mm sur bo
07-02-2025 20:25
Enrique Rubio
Dear all.Ascomata pheritecioid, KOH-negative, flas
07-02-2025 17:48
Vasileios Kaounas
asci 170-200 x 20-22 ?m spores 21.9 [22.9 ; 23.4]
06-02-2025 06:25
Bharati MandapatiHi All, I would love some help with this Lasiobel
05-02-2025 04:38
Ethan CrensonHi all, Found by a friend last Saturday in Staten
Please, read the attached pdf.
Bryoscyphus-on-Conocephalum-conicum-0001.pdf
Hi Enrique, did you find crystals in the excipulum ?
Amitiés
Michel
what a wonderful collection!!! I don't think it is turbinatus. Why not conocephali? Surely, the spores are too narrow, but: 1. The apical ring in turbinatus is Calycina-type, conocephali is Hymenoscyphus-type. 2. The living paraphyses of B. turbinatus are eguttulate.
Conclusion: B. turbinatus is no Bryoscyphus at all. In fact, an unpublished phylotree by Marie Davy shows it to be with Arachnopeziza!
I think you have at least something very close to B. conocephali, and I am especially happy because this is the first time I see this species alive, which is the type of the genus.
Zotto
Hi MIchel and Zotto
No, Michel. I don't find crystals in the excipulum but I couldn't study well it because I have only two apothecia.
Really very interesting your advices, Zotto. I was thinking that is was not conocephali because the ascospores described by Kirk and Spooner are very polymorphic and broader.
Do you want my pics at higher resolution?
Many thanks to both