08-07-2022 02:34
Stefan JakobssonI found a Vibrissea which in most respects resembl
08-07-2022 19:54
Castillo Joseba
de ayer en madera de fagusA ver si hay alguna suge
07-07-2022 18:22
Gonzalez Garcia MartaBuenas tardes, No consigo decidirme por una de las
06-07-2022 11:37
Jennifer FiorentinoWhilst examining a branch of a carob tree I notice
04-07-2022 23:00
Ethan CrensonHello all, I was hoping to get an opinion on thes
Vibrissea flavovirens?
Stefan Jakobsson,
08-07-2022 02:34
Can it be confirmed that this is V. flavovirens?
Hans-Otto Baral,
08-07-2022 08:39
Re : Vibrissea flavovirens?
I think the colour is not so important. Since I do not have an overniew on available measurements, I cannot easily say if such small measurements ever occurred, but I do not know a further species with these characters.
Stefan Jakobsson,
08-07-2022 11:49
Re : Vibrissea flavovirens?
Thank you!
I looked up the asci and spore size in a few sources.
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-07-2022 09:42
Re : Vibrissea flavovirens?
Thanks for this survey. In my key I wrote for flavovirens:
asci *260-343 x 6.5-8.8 µm
spores *125-195 x 1.2-1.8 µm
spore fragments *(27–)30-42(–51) µm
Ascus measurements in your table are probably mostly in dead state, but the differences to living asci are apparently not very high.
In the type of V. minima Velen. on Salix, which I restudied and considered a synonym, I found asci +154 x 4.8-5.3 and spore fragments 27-48 µm. So your spore fragments are a bit shorter than usual.
In a collection from Sheffield (HB 9520) I measured spores *125-134 µm long (like yours), breaking into 4 part spores of *27-38 x 1.3-1.6 µm, 4-celled (ascus length not measured).
In the case there is a continuum of measurements among collections, I suspect that living asci much shorter than 260 µm also occur.
Identities in the literature are perhaps not certain. E.g. Zheng & Zhuang 2017 do not mention the number of spore cells and fragments, but the spore photo suggests flavovirens indeed.