Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

28-06-2022 20:12

Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová) Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)

Hello,I repeatedly collect a foliicolous Ascobolus

01-07-2022 15:28

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10267081

29-06-2022 08:43

Mirek Gryc

Hello everyone Because the mushroom seems to be v

29-06-2022 13:19

Andrew N. Miller Andrew N. Miller

Does anyone have this as a PDF?Munk A (1965). On s

28-06-2022 22:07

Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová) Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)

Hello,I would welcome some help with these little

29-06-2022 10:29

ruiz Jose

Hola a todos,recientemente he mandado a analizar e

27-06-2022 15:49

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour, Sur branche morte attenante d'Ulmus mino

28-06-2022 21:27

Hardware Tony Hardware Tony

Hopefully there aren't too many 6-spored sps. to s

27-06-2022 11:46

Bernard Declercq Bernard Declercq

Dear all,I am looking for a pdf of following paper

27-06-2022 11:14

Laurent Bonneau Laurent Bonneau

bonjour, sur branchette de feuillu au bord d'un

« < 205 206 207 208 209 > »
Ascobolus cf. foliicola
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová), 28-06-2022 20:12
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)Hello,
I repeatedly collect a foliicolous Ascobolus in one locality in Moravia (200 m a.s.l., on decaying, very wet leaves of Alnus and Salix, close to the Morava river).
First I identified it as Ascobolus foliicola, but now I am in doubts whether the identification is correct.
The features highlighted by van Brummelen as important for distinguishing A. foliicola and A. denudatus are the following ones:
* stalked receptacle (foliicola) vs. sessile receptacle (denudatus) - I would consider my apothecia rather sessile or only shortly stipitate
* margin permanently furfuraceous (foliicola) vs. soon smooth (denudatus) - here my find fits better A. denudatus
* excipular warts consisting of subglobose and pyriform cells (foliicola) vs. only subglobose cells (denudatus) - I can see a few pyriform cells, but the majority is subglobose

Ornamentation of ascospores clearly fits better A. foliicola, at least when judging from van Brummelen´s illustrations.. Their dimensions are (18.1)18.5-20 (20.4) × 9.7-10.9) µm
Q = 1.8 -1.9
Me = 19.2 × 10.3 µm
How would you determine it?
Zuzana
  • message #73179
  • message #73179
  • message #73179
  • message #73179
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová), 28-06-2022 20:13
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Re : Ascobolus cf. foliicola
Wall of asci is not blue neither in IKI nor in MLZ, but the content of immature asci as well as cells of ectal excipulum turns violet in IKI.
  • message #73180
  • message #73180
  • message #73180
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová), 28-06-2022 20:17
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Re : Ascobolus cf. foliicola
more
  • message #73181
  • message #73181
  • message #73181
  • message #73181
  • message #73181
Till Lohmeyer, 29-06-2022 10:05
Re : Ascobolus cf. foliicola
Good morning, Zuzana - 

comparing van Brummelen's illustrations 40 c (foliicola) and 41 (denudatus) you will note a remarkable difference: The spores of foliicola look like "drawn by a trembling hand", those of denudatus don't. Thus, I'm pretty sure, your fungus should be A. foliicola. 

Best regards from Bavaria
Till
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová), 29-06-2022 17:48
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Re : Ascobolus cf. foliicola
Hello Till,
thank you very much!
Zuzana
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 30-06-2022 16:00
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Ascobolus cf. foliicola
Hello.
A. denudatus can be excluded because its ascospores always show some pustules.
In the other hand, I do not recognize A. foliicola I used to collect, but I do not have any other idea.
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová), 01-07-2022 18:14
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Re : Ascobolus cf. foliicola
Thank you :-)