
29-04-2015 14:19
Hi to everybody I would know your opinion about t

30-04-2015 16:42
Garcia SusanaHi all:Can someone send me a pdf of the article:Sh

30-04-2015 09:30

Dear friendsAmong the old samples, which are store

30-04-2015 12:00
Katarina PastircakovaHi there, Does anyone have these papers? Bagyana

29-04-2015 11:36

Bonjour à tous.Je sollicite votre aide pour ce pe
Asco sur Urtica2
Bernard CLESSE,
30-04-2015 23:38

a) spores uniseptées, étranglées : 15,5-17x5,5-6
b) conidies présentes
Je pense à Mycosphaerella superflua.
D'accord ?
Bernard
Björn Wergen,
30-04-2015 23:57

Re : Asco sur Urtica2
Hi,
maybe, I am not sure, first it reminds me on Didymella sp., which also occurs on dead Urtica stems. I have a quite similar collection on Galium aparine which I had identified as D. exigua.
I guess M. superflua has smaller spores, like they are shown on Enrique's photos.
regards,
björn
maybe, I am not sure, first it reminds me on Didymella sp., which also occurs on dead Urtica stems. I have a quite similar collection on Galium aparine which I had identified as D. exigua.
I guess M. superflua has smaller spores, like they are shown on Enrique's photos.
regards,
björn
Bernard CLESSE,
01-05-2015 09:38

Re : Asco sur Urtica2
Hello Björn,
Thank you for your answer! Does someone can show me photos of Enrique?
Big thank you in advance!
Bernard
Gernot Friebes,
01-05-2015 16:56
Re : Asco sur Urtica2
Hi Bernard,
I think Björn is referring to this page: http://www.ascofrance.fr/search_recolte/3477
Best wishes,
Gernot
I think Björn is referring to this page: http://www.ascofrance.fr/search_recolte/3477
Best wishes,
Gernot
Bernard CLESSE,
01-05-2015 20:15

Re : Asco sur Urtica2
Big thank you to both Björn and Gernot for your help.
For now, I do not see clear about the differences between the two species. I will check the size of the spores again.
For you, what would be the single most useful to separate the two species?
Bernard