07-02-2023 22:28
Ethan CrensonHello friends, On Sunday, in the southern part of
19-02-2026 17:49
Salvador Emilio JoseHola buenas tardes!! Necesito ayuda para la ident
19-02-2026 13:50
Margot en Geert VullingsWe found this collection on deciduous wood on 7-2-
16-02-2026 21:25
Andreas Millinger
Good evening,failed to find an idea for this fungu
08-12-2025 17:37
Lothar Krieglsteiner
20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened
17-02-2026 17:26
Nicolas Suberbielle
Bonjour à tous, Je recherche cette publication :
Xylaria guepinii\ friesii?
Przemyslaw Drzewiecki,
22-03-2020 22:03
https://www.bio-forum.pl/messages/33/1102700.html
Jacques Fournier,
25-03-2020 18:02
Re : Xylaria guepinii\ friesii?
Hello,
I was hoping that Thomas would answer because he revised the type specimen of X. guepini and created X. friesii.
In the meantime, based on your data and Laessoe's 1993 paper, I think your collection fits well X. guepini in all respects.
It is a poorly known species, rarely collected at sexual state, thus you collection is of great interest.
Thanks for sharing it.
Cheers,
Jacques
Thomas Læssøe,
26-03-2020 10:19
Re : Xylaria guepinii\ friesii?
Just back from Cuba (birding) to a closed university etc. I would agree with Jacques that X. guepinii is the best match (super material), but I have not studied this complex for decennia so feel a bit rusty. It is still a possibility that both scotica and my own friesii should be lumped with guepinii.
bw
Thomas
bw
Thomas
Przemyslaw Drzewiecki,
26-03-2020 13:47
Re : Xylaria guepinii\ friesii?
I would like to thank both excellent interlocutors for their contributions. I am very happy.
Have a nice day - Przemek
Have a nice day - Przemek
Przemyslaw Drzewiecki,
17-12-2023 21:59
Re : Xylaria guepinii\ friesii?
Hallo all,
I read a new article about this species: Hsieh H-M, Ju Y-M, Lechat C, Fournier J, Huart D. New ecological, morphological, cultural and molecular phylogenetic insights into Xylaria guepini (Xylariaceae) Ascomycete.org. 2022;14:177–184.
I very much regret that the authors lacked scientific inquisitiveness and did not ask me for part of my collection for comparative analysis. :-( Especially since, when comparing the morphology of both collections, due to significant differences, especially (though not only) in the aspect of conidiogeny, it should be assumed that they are different species of the Xylaria genus.
I am fully willing to cooperate in further research on this species (unfortunately I do not have the ability to conduct genetic research myself),
best regards, Przemek
I read a new article about this species: Hsieh H-M, Ju Y-M, Lechat C, Fournier J, Huart D. New ecological, morphological, cultural and molecular phylogenetic insights into Xylaria guepini (Xylariaceae) Ascomycete.org. 2022;14:177–184.
I very much regret that the authors lacked scientific inquisitiveness and did not ask me for part of my collection for comparative analysis. :-( Especially since, when comparing the morphology of both collections, due to significant differences, especially (though not only) in the aspect of conidiogeny, it should be assumed that they are different species of the Xylaria genus.
I am fully willing to cooperate in further research on this species (unfortunately I do not have the ability to conduct genetic research myself),
best regards, Przemek
