Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

24-04-2024 21:54

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour, J'ai trouvé ce Lasiobolus sur laissées

23-04-2024 15:18

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

... but likely a basidiomycete. I hope it is o.k.

23-04-2024 13:17

Edouard Evangelisti Edouard Evangelisti

Bonjour à tous, Je viens de récolter ce que je

23-04-2024 21:49

Ethan Crenson

Hello all, A friend recently found this orange as

22-04-2024 11:52

Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová) Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)

Hello,I made a loan of a collection of Microstoma

11-01-2022 16:36

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Hi does anyone have a digital copy of Raitviir A (

22-04-2024 08:54

Rafael Cabral

Bonjour à toutes et tous, Quelqu'un pourrait-il

22-04-2024 20:38

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good afternoon.Does anyone know this anamorph?It g

21-04-2024 14:29

B Shelbourne B Shelbourne

• Genus Brunnipila: Distinct macro and habitat,

19-04-2024 14:28

B Shelbourne B Shelbourne

Cudoniella tenuispora: Distinctive macro and habit

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Pezicula(?)
Gernot Friebes, 29-08-2009 23:46
Hi,

this asco grew on cones of Picea amongst Hyaloscypha britannica on and next to old pyrenomycetes. Because of the asci which sometimes have a reddish porus in lugol and the septated spores I thought of Pezicula but I am not sure about this. I would appreciate your opinions!

Best wishes,

Gernot

  • message #8827
Gernot Friebes, 29-08-2009 23:47
Re:Pezicula(?)
S...spores (4-celled, 16-19 x 6-7 µm)
A IKI...Asci in lugol (some asci with a dirty reddish porus but most with a blue one)
P...paraphyses (filiform, up to 2,5 µm wide, sometimes furcate)
E...excipulum
A...asci in water (up to 90 x 5 µm, I did not see any croziers)

  • message #8828
Gernot Friebes, 29-08-2009 23:48
Re:Pezicula(?)
asci in lugol again
  • message #8829
Hans-Otto Baral, 30-08-2009 00:58
Hans-Otto Baral
Re:Pezicula(?)
I have presently no idea but it is surely no Pezicula because 1. the reaction is not purely red but blue at lower concentration, and 2. the spores are not filled with oil drops and they seem to get 4-celled prior to being ejected.

The apothecia remind me a bit of taxa I place provisionary in Naeviopsis, but those have inamyloid asci and obvious carotenois oil drops in the paraphyses

Again, is this from a kontaneous site?

Zotto
Gernot Friebes, 30-08-2009 09:07
Re:Pezicula(?)
Hi Zotto,

thanks for your opinion of these two fungi. Both were found in a raised bog in the Thüringer Wald, so yes, they are from montaneous site.

Best wishes,

Gernot
Hans-Otto Baral, 30-08-2009 20:52
Hans-Otto Baral
Re:Pezicula(?)
Hallo Gernot

now I know what you have. It is what I identified as Coryne terrestris Velen. 1934: 113, see DVD. My two drawings should be in dir. Calycellina, subdir. terrestris. One was on Picea cone, the other on sandy soil. Calycellina is only a tentative genus for this apparently rare fungus because the apically flexuous and branched paraphyses are unusual there.

Zotto
Gernot Friebes, 30-08-2009 21:13
Re:Pezicula(?)
Hi Zotto,

many thanks, your drawings look similar to my fungus. But I have one question left: what is the "right" name for this fungus? In Index Fungorum Coryne terresttris is a anamorphic Ascocoryne. Is it OK to call it Calycellina terrestris (even though Calycellina does not fit perfectly)?

Best wishes,

Gernot
Hans-Otto Baral, 30-08-2009 21:19
Hans-Otto Baral
Re:Pezicula(?)
This is one of many dozends of similar unclear cases. Velenovsky's description is too bad to be sure about the identity, and I never met another description that might fit (though there might exist some). To clarify needs revision of the type material. You can call it ad interim Calycellina. Coryne is of course inacceptable, even Ascocoryne is certainly out of place.

Zotto
Gernot Friebes, 30-08-2009 21:28
Re:Pezicula(?)
ok, I will call it Calycellina terrestris ad. int.
A very interesting fungus!

Best wishes and thanks again,

Gernot