12-07-2015 00:05
Nedim Jukic
This one from the same locality as the previous on
12-11-2019 10:32
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Hi againExactly at the same place than my previous
30-05-2026 21:12
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,
31-05-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a rather
25-05-2026 16:35
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,
29-05-2026 15:35
daniel FERREBonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre aide pour cette
28-05-2026 16:15
James MitchellHello,Does anyone have the original publication of
28-05-2026 11:06
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10596750
micropodia
NC NC,
09-06-2009 11:43
Il y a 10 ans environ je considérais que Micropodia pteridina que l'on trouve traditionnellement sur les parties noircies et souterraines de fougère aigle et Psilachnum chrysostigmum sur tiges de fougère ou prèle étaient synonymes ce dernier étant prioritaire; j'ai un doute maintenant, d'autant que les deux espèces sont mentionnées dans la base Ascofrance et l'Index Fungorum.. Qu'en est t-il exactement ?
Amitiés
Robert
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-06-2009 11:55
Re:micropodia
Hi Robert
how are you?
This question is really quite old and still not progressed. The type of M. pteridina which I studied long ago is certainly another species than that which you know. It also grew on Pteridium but not on the blackened bases, and seems to me to be a pteridicolous Diplonaevia.
That on the blackened bases is a Psilachnum but differs from P. chrysostigmum in the absence of croziers. It has so far no name.
Zotto
how are you?
This question is really quite old and still not progressed. The type of M. pteridina which I studied long ago is certainly another species than that which you know. It also grew on Pteridium but not on the blackened bases, and seems to me to be a pteridicolous Diplonaevia.
That on the blackened bases is a Psilachnum but differs from P. chrysostigmum in the absence of croziers. It has so far no name.
Zotto