Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

04-06-2026 23:53

Cistella sacconii
Stip Helleman Stip Helleman

Dear all, someone can get acces to this article f

19-05-2026 10:27

Peziza phlebospora ?
Patrice TANCHAUD

Bonjour, récolte récente sur terre retournée i

04-06-2026 18:39

Pyreno on Vaccinium myrtillus
Gernot Friebes

Hi,I collected this species in two different locat

22-05-2026 13:29

Pseudophacidium ?necans on Vaccinium myrtillus
Gernot Friebes

Hi,I am curious to hear your opinion on this mater

04-06-2026 15:28

Scutellinia
Tony Cumberlidge

I have recently found the very helpful European Ke

04-06-2026 10:50

Trichopezizella ?
François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour, J'ai trouvé hier un petit asco observé

04-06-2026 07:02

Psilachnum (?) sp.
François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour, Voici la description d'une espèce qui p

04-06-2026 13:34

Leptosphaeria barriae/wehmeyeri on Lupinus
Gernot Friebes

Hi,I am interested to hear your opinion on this Le

04-06-2026 11:36

Tryblis-like on Vaccinium myrtillus
Gernot Friebes

Hi,found on Vaccinium myrtillus.Asci: IKI –, 8-s

04-06-2026 11:14

Cistella ?
Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour, Sur bois mort de conifère (Larix, Pinus

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Tricharina
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 22:54
Bonsoir,

récolte au sol, apothécie 8 mm pour la plus grande, spores 16-19 x 9,5-11 µm.

J'y verrais bien Tricharina praecox...
Merci d'avance pour vos avis éventuels.

Patrice
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 23:26
Re : Tricharina
En poursuivant les recherches, je vois que T. ochroleuca pourrait être un bon prétendant...

A voir.
Uwe Lindemann, 18-01-2024 14:40
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Hi Patrice,
T. ochroleuca is a nomen dubium.
Regarding the shape of the ascospores I would suggest hiemalis, subhiemals or tophiseda. Did you use the key in the following paper? https://ascomycete.org/Journal/Article/art-0363
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 10:31
Re : Tricharina
Many thanks Uwe for this reference, I had not considered this publication, although it is of great importance given the quality of the work with sequencing. The spores, without guttules or granules, seem to eliminate T. tophiseda, then concluding between T. hiemalis and T. subhiemalis seems more difficult without DNA.
Uwe Lindemann, 19-01-2024 12:37
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Because of the spore quotient, I would tend towards hiemalis. But to be absolutely sure, sequencing would be necessary.
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 17:44
Re : Tricharina
We agree. Thanks.