Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

20-05-2026 17:47

Mollisia on Juncus
Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this Mollisia on dead Juncus stems mown l

20-05-2026 21:49

Lachnum on Juncus -> Lachnum pudicellum
Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this Lachnum on Juncus stems mown last ye

21-05-2026 17:01

Recherche de document
Pierre Repellin

Bonjour à toutes et à tous,Je recherche l'articl

20-05-2026 20:08

pyreno on Fraxinus
Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening,another quite distinctive find from M

20-05-2026 12:57

unknown semi-aquatic objects
Ingo Ibelshäuser Ingo Ibelshäuser

Hello everybody, on decayed hardwood e.g. Quercus

20-05-2026 18:15

cf Godronia sp.
Moreno Miriam

Hello! I am working on my master's thesis on the d

22-04-2026 20:54

Pyrenopeziza on monocot.
Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everybody.This Pyrenopeziza grew in moist le

17-05-2026 22:09

Mollisia sp
éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Je sollicite vos avis pour ce Molli

19-05-2026 19:47

Xylariaceae?
Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Hello dear community,found this species the second

19-05-2026 12:55

Mollisia sps? with minute spores 2.7 -3.5µm.
Hardware Tony Hardware Tony

After checking Gminder and Otto's library I cannot

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Tricharina
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 22:54
Bonsoir,

récolte au sol, apothécie 8 mm pour la plus grande, spores 16-19 x 9,5-11 µm.

J'y verrais bien Tricharina praecox...
Merci d'avance pour vos avis éventuels.

Patrice
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 23:26
Re : Tricharina
En poursuivant les recherches, je vois que T. ochroleuca pourrait être un bon prétendant...

A voir.
Uwe Lindemann, 18-01-2024 14:40
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Hi Patrice,
T. ochroleuca is a nomen dubium.
Regarding the shape of the ascospores I would suggest hiemalis, subhiemals or tophiseda. Did you use the key in the following paper? https://ascomycete.org/Journal/Article/art-0363
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 10:31
Re : Tricharina
Many thanks Uwe for this reference, I had not considered this publication, although it is of great importance given the quality of the work with sequencing. The spores, without guttules or granules, seem to eliminate T. tophiseda, then concluding between T. hiemalis and T. subhiemalis seems more difficult without DNA.
Uwe Lindemann, 19-01-2024 12:37
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Because of the spore quotient, I would tend towards hiemalis. But to be absolutely sure, sequencing would be necessary.
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 17:44
Re : Tricharina
We agree. Thanks.