Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

16-07-2024 18:32

Bryophilous disco on Liochlaena
Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonsoir, Un discomycète sur Liochlaena lanceolat

17-07-2024 16:29

Unknown on snail
Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Hello,A colleague found an unknown fungus on the s

17-07-2024 10:53

Le Gal M (1959)
Hans-Otto Baral Hans-Otto Baral

I have a question about the scaling of illustratio

17-07-2024 08:35

Search articles
Peter Welt Peter Welt

Who can help? Malloch, D.; Hubart, J.-M. 1987. An

17-07-2024 11:33

literature request
Angel Pintos Angel Pintos

Hello, anybody body has:Pande A. and Rao, V.G. (1

11-01-2022 16:36

Literature request: Raitviir (2004) Revised synopsis of Hyaloscyphaceae?
Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Hi does anyone have a digital copy of Raitviir A (

24-08-2020 13:00

Literature request: von Arx 1973
Yulia Lytvynenko Yulia Lytvynenko

Dear friends.Looking for a copy of the following w

11-07-2024 14:29

Mollisia cf caricina
Viktorie Halasu Viktorie Halasu

Hello, a thin-fleshed Mollisia on a monocot stem

15-07-2024 10:38

Ascobolus
Joaquin Martin

Hi, I found this Ascobolus in company of Cheilyme

14-07-2024 18:23

Ascomycete on dung
Joaquin Martin

Hi,I found this Ascomycete on horse dung.The spora

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Tricharina
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 22:54
Bonsoir,

récolte au sol, apothécie 8 mm pour la plus grande, spores 16-19 x 9,5-11 µm.

J'y verrais bien Tricharina praecox...
Merci d'avance pour vos avis éventuels.

Patrice
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 23:26
Re : Tricharina
En poursuivant les recherches, je vois que T. ochroleuca pourrait être un bon prétendant...

A voir.
Uwe Lindemann, 18-01-2024 14:40
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Hi Patrice,
T. ochroleuca is a nomen dubium.
Regarding the shape of the ascospores I would suggest hiemalis, subhiemals or tophiseda. Did you use the key in the following paper? https://ascomycete.org/Journal/Article/art-0363
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 10:31
Re : Tricharina
Many thanks Uwe for this reference, I had not considered this publication, although it is of great importance given the quality of the work with sequencing. The spores, without guttules or granules, seem to eliminate T. tophiseda, then concluding between T. hiemalis and T. subhiemalis seems more difficult without DNA.
Uwe Lindemann, 19-01-2024 12:37
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Because of the spore quotient, I would tend towards hiemalis. But to be absolutely sure, sequencing would be necessary.
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 17:44
Re : Tricharina
We agree. Thanks.