Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

02-07-2025 09:32

Searching of a paper from The Mycologist
Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Hello, bonjour.Here is the paper I'm searching for

30-06-2025 16:56

Septoria on Impatiens glandulifera
Lydia Koelmans

Please can anyone tell me the species name of the

01-07-2025 23:37

Help with a Pleosporal.
Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A Pleosporal symbiotic organism located and

30-06-2025 12:09

Black erumpent on Populus (Ascodichaenaceae?)
Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

This tiny, rather "rough" erumpent asco was found

30-06-2025 06:57

Pezizales --Pyronema?
Ethan Crenson

Hi all, Another find by a friend yesterday in Bro

30-06-2025 19:05

RECHERCHE ARTICLE
ALAIN BOUVIER

Bonjour à toutes et à tousJe cherche à lire l'a

30-06-2025 14:45

is this a Hymenoscyphus on Nothofagus?
Götz Palfner Götz Palfner

This is a quite common species on Nothofagus wood

25-06-2025 16:56

Scutellinia cejpii ?
Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour, pensez-vous que S. ceijpii soit le nom co

29-06-2025 18:11

unknown discomycete from Brooklyn
Ethan Crenson

Hello all, A friend found this disco yesterday in

28-06-2025 17:10

Literature Request
Peter Welt Peter Welt

I'm looking for: RANALLI, M.E., GAMUNDÍ, I.J. 19

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Tricharina
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 22:54
Bonsoir,

récolte au sol, apothécie 8 mm pour la plus grande, spores 16-19 x 9,5-11 µm.

J'y verrais bien Tricharina praecox...
Merci d'avance pour vos avis éventuels.

Patrice
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 23:26
Re : Tricharina
En poursuivant les recherches, je vois que T. ochroleuca pourrait être un bon prétendant...

A voir.
Uwe Lindemann, 18-01-2024 14:40
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Hi Patrice,
T. ochroleuca is a nomen dubium.
Regarding the shape of the ascospores I would suggest hiemalis, subhiemals or tophiseda. Did you use the key in the following paper? https://ascomycete.org/Journal/Article/art-0363
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 10:31
Re : Tricharina
Many thanks Uwe for this reference, I had not considered this publication, although it is of great importance given the quality of the work with sequencing. The spores, without guttules or granules, seem to eliminate T. tophiseda, then concluding between T. hiemalis and T. subhiemalis seems more difficult without DNA.
Uwe Lindemann, 19-01-2024 12:37
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Because of the spore quotient, I would tend towards hiemalis. But to be absolutely sure, sequencing would be necessary.
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 17:44
Re : Tricharina
We agree. Thanks.