07-12-2025 16:07
Arnold BüschlenHallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiohy
05-12-2025 17:33
Bruno Coué
Bonjour, je serais heureux de recueillir votre avi
07-12-2025 09:24
Castillo Joseba
De la pasada semana en Galicia EspañaEn el suelo
06-12-2025 00:19
Viktorie Halasu
Hello, would anyone have this article, please? An
02-12-2025 18:59
Malcolm Greaves
This pair of ascos 2.5cm across were on recently b
Tricharina
Patrice TANCHAUD,
17-01-2024 22:54
Bonsoir,
récolte au sol, apothécie 8 mm pour la plus grande, spores 16-19 x 9,5-11 µm.
J'y verrais bien Tricharina praecox...
Merci d'avance pour vos avis éventuels.
Patrice
Merci d'avance pour vos avis éventuels.
Patrice
Doc1-0077.pdf
Patrice TANCHAUD,
17-01-2024 23:26
Re : Tricharina
En poursuivant les recherches, je vois que T. ochroleuca pourrait être un bon prétendant...
A voir.
Uwe Lindemann,
18-01-2024 14:40
Re : Tricharina
Hi Patrice,
T. ochroleuca is a nomen dubium.
Regarding the shape of the ascospores I would suggest hiemalis, subhiemals or tophiseda. Did you use the key in the following paper? https://ascomycete.org/Journal/Article/art-0363
Best, Uwe
T. ochroleuca is a nomen dubium.
Regarding the shape of the ascospores I would suggest hiemalis, subhiemals or tophiseda. Did you use the key in the following paper? https://ascomycete.org/Journal/Article/art-0363
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD,
19-01-2024 10:31
Re : Tricharina
Many thanks Uwe for this reference, I had not considered this publication, although it is of great importance given the quality of the work with sequencing. The spores, without guttules or granules, seem to eliminate T. tophiseda, then concluding between T. hiemalis and T. subhiemalis seems more difficult without DNA.
Uwe Lindemann,
19-01-2024 12:37
Re : Tricharina
Because of the spore quotient, I would tend towards hiemalis. But to be absolutely sure, sequencing would be necessary.
Best, Uwe
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD,
19-01-2024 17:44
Re : Tricharina
We agree. Thanks.