Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

07-01-2026 22:22

Tatraea sp. on indet. hardwood - 303452087
Danny Newman Danny Newman

Tatraea sp. on indet. hardwood The Swag, Great Sm

07-01-2026 17:29

White tree-like anamorph on Populus
Marc Detollenaere Marc Detollenaere

Dear Forum,On a barkless Populus I found some smal

10-11-2021 17:33

anamorph Chlorociboria aeruginella
Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Add-on topic http://www.ascofrance.com/forum/7059

07-01-2026 10:24

Pezicula sp. on indet. hardwood - 303870019
Danny Newman Danny Newman

Pezicula sp. on indet. hardwood Appalachian Highl

07-01-2026 10:05

cf. Chaetospermum on Xylaria - 303631739
Danny Newman Danny Newman

cf. Chaetospermum on XylariaCosby Campground, Grea

06-01-2026 20:54

Gymnoascus ?
Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour à tous et meilleurs voeux pour cette nouv

02-01-2026 17:43

Spores with a sheath
MARICEL PATINO

Hi there, although I couldn't see the fruitbody, I

04-01-2026 17:45

Pithya cupressina with large apothecia looking like P. vulgaris.
Stephen Martin Mifsud Stephen Martin Mifsud

I was happy to find these orange asmocyetes which

02-01-2026 22:48

Calycina languida ?
éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Je profite de cette nouvelle demand

02-01-2026 19:35

Thysanophora?
William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone,First of all, my best wishes

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Tricharina
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 22:54
Bonsoir,

récolte au sol, apothécie 8 mm pour la plus grande, spores 16-19 x 9,5-11 µm.

J'y verrais bien Tricharina praecox...
Merci d'avance pour vos avis éventuels.

Patrice
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 23:26
Re : Tricharina
En poursuivant les recherches, je vois que T. ochroleuca pourrait être un bon prétendant...

A voir.
Uwe Lindemann, 18-01-2024 14:40
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Hi Patrice,
T. ochroleuca is a nomen dubium.
Regarding the shape of the ascospores I would suggest hiemalis, subhiemals or tophiseda. Did you use the key in the following paper? https://ascomycete.org/Journal/Article/art-0363
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 10:31
Re : Tricharina
Many thanks Uwe for this reference, I had not considered this publication, although it is of great importance given the quality of the work with sequencing. The spores, without guttules or granules, seem to eliminate T. tophiseda, then concluding between T. hiemalis and T. subhiemalis seems more difficult without DNA.
Uwe Lindemann, 19-01-2024 12:37
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Because of the spore quotient, I would tend towards hiemalis. But to be absolutely sure, sequencing would be necessary.
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 17:44
Re : Tricharina
We agree. Thanks.