Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

17-11-2009 22:22

Peziza avec latex
Pablo Chacón Pablo Chacón

Bonne nuit, Voir si vous m'avez élaguée appor

07-12-2015 14:17

Una Peziza a latice giallo-verdastro con croziers
Zugna Marino Zugna Marino

Buon giorno a tutti, ad un primo momento, non ess

25-11-2012 20:32

Otidea o Peziza?
Bometon Javier Bometon Javier

Ascomas cupoliformes abiertos lateralmente, himeni

25-01-2026 16:08

Geoglossum
Malcolm Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Geoglossum had spores mostly 70-80 (87) with

27-01-2026 11:43

DNA match
Malcolm Greaves Malcolm Greaves

Is anyone with experience of DNA testing able to t

26-01-2026 11:49

Anamorph on Cytisus
Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this possible anamorph on a dead Cytisus

25-01-2026 23:23

Delitschia/Lojkania? on wood
Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

Hello! I found this species that resembles Delitsc

18-01-2026 12:24

Anamorph on an olive tree
Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.An anamorph located on the surface of a thin

23-01-2026 21:50

Looking for a paper please
Cameron DK

I am looking for this please publication. is anyon

10-01-2026 20:00

Lichenicolous fungus on Protoparmeliopsis muralis
Tom Schrier

Hi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Tricharina
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 22:54
Bonsoir,

récolte au sol, apothécie 8 mm pour la plus grande, spores 16-19 x 9,5-11 µm.

J'y verrais bien Tricharina praecox...
Merci d'avance pour vos avis éventuels.

Patrice
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 23:26
Re : Tricharina
En poursuivant les recherches, je vois que T. ochroleuca pourrait être un bon prétendant...

A voir.
Uwe Lindemann, 18-01-2024 14:40
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Hi Patrice,
T. ochroleuca is a nomen dubium.
Regarding the shape of the ascospores I would suggest hiemalis, subhiemals or tophiseda. Did you use the key in the following paper? https://ascomycete.org/Journal/Article/art-0363
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 10:31
Re : Tricharina
Many thanks Uwe for this reference, I had not considered this publication, although it is of great importance given the quality of the work with sequencing. The spores, without guttules or granules, seem to eliminate T. tophiseda, then concluding between T. hiemalis and T. subhiemalis seems more difficult without DNA.
Uwe Lindemann, 19-01-2024 12:37
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Because of the spore quotient, I would tend towards hiemalis. But to be absolutely sure, sequencing would be necessary.
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 17:44
Re : Tricharina
We agree. Thanks.