Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

30-10-2025 03:53

Ethan Crenson

Hi all,  I would like an opinion on whether this

09-08-2025 13:13

Maria Plekkenpol Maria Plekkenpol

Hello,Yesterday I found these on burnt soil. Apoth

28-10-2025 19:33

Nicolas Suberbielle Nicolas Suberbielle

Bonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre avis sur cette r

29-10-2025 19:02

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

De la pasada semana en rama posiblemente de hayaPi

25-11-2016 13:54

Stephen Martin Mifsud Stephen Martin Mifsud

Hi, I found numerous seeds of Washingtonia robusta

28-10-2025 22:22

Bernard Declercq Bernard Declercq

Hello.I'm searching for the following paper:Punith

27-10-2025 19:51

Peter Welt Peter Welt

Who has this article? Doveri, F. 2007. Sporormiel

28-10-2025 15:37

Carl Farmer

I'd be grateful for any suggestions for this strik

28-10-2025 11:29

Tanja Böhning Tanja Böhning

Hello, I found this very small (ca 0,5mm) yellow

27-10-2025 00:34

Francois Guay Francois Guay

I found this strange species in Québec,Canada, gr

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Tricharina
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 22:54
Bonsoir,

récolte au sol, apothécie 8 mm pour la plus grande, spores 16-19 x 9,5-11 µm.

J'y verrais bien Tricharina praecox...
Merci d'avance pour vos avis éventuels.

Patrice
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 23:26
Re : Tricharina
En poursuivant les recherches, je vois que T. ochroleuca pourrait être un bon prétendant...

A voir.
Uwe Lindemann, 18-01-2024 14:40
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Hi Patrice,
T. ochroleuca is a nomen dubium.
Regarding the shape of the ascospores I would suggest hiemalis, subhiemals or tophiseda. Did you use the key in the following paper? https://ascomycete.org/Journal/Article/art-0363
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 10:31
Re : Tricharina
Many thanks Uwe for this reference, I had not considered this publication, although it is of great importance given the quality of the work with sequencing. The spores, without guttules or granules, seem to eliminate T. tophiseda, then concluding between T. hiemalis and T. subhiemalis seems more difficult without DNA.
Uwe Lindemann, 19-01-2024 12:37
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Because of the spore quotient, I would tend towards hiemalis. But to be absolutely sure, sequencing would be necessary.
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 17:44
Re : Tricharina
We agree. Thanks.