Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

04-12-2025 23:53

Anthracobia key
Malcolm Greaves Malcolm Greaves

Is there an up to date Anthracobia key available?T

04-12-2025 21:30

literature search
Ethan Crenson

Hello all, I am looking for the following:  Bar

02-12-2025 18:59

Round spores asco
Malcolm Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This pair of ascos 2.5cm across were on recently b

03-12-2025 20:02

Godronia sp.
Buckwheat Pete

Hello everyone, does anyone know the genus Godroni

02-12-2025 19:25

Lasiosphaeriaceae
Buckwheat Pete

Hello, can anyone identify this hairy fungus growi

02-12-2025 14:28

Urceolella crispula?
Mirek Gryc

527 / 5 000Hello everyoneThey grew on dead shoots

30-11-2025 12:53

Calycina cf. languida
Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

White short-stipitate apothecia found on thin twig

30-11-2025 10:47

Peziza fimeti or granulosa
William Slosse William Slosse

I recently found a collection of small Peziza sp.

27-11-2025 12:01

Valsa/Cytospora on Cryptomeria bark - Denmark
Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727

27-11-2025 11:46

another loculo on Aesculus with muriform spores - Denmark
Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Tricharina
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 22:54
Bonsoir,

récolte au sol, apothécie 8 mm pour la plus grande, spores 16-19 x 9,5-11 µm.

J'y verrais bien Tricharina praecox...
Merci d'avance pour vos avis éventuels.

Patrice
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 23:26
Re : Tricharina
En poursuivant les recherches, je vois que T. ochroleuca pourrait être un bon prétendant...

A voir.
Uwe Lindemann, 18-01-2024 14:40
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Hi Patrice,
T. ochroleuca is a nomen dubium.
Regarding the shape of the ascospores I would suggest hiemalis, subhiemals or tophiseda. Did you use the key in the following paper? https://ascomycete.org/Journal/Article/art-0363
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 10:31
Re : Tricharina
Many thanks Uwe for this reference, I had not considered this publication, although it is of great importance given the quality of the work with sequencing. The spores, without guttules or granules, seem to eliminate T. tophiseda, then concluding between T. hiemalis and T. subhiemalis seems more difficult without DNA.
Uwe Lindemann, 19-01-2024 12:37
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Because of the spore quotient, I would tend towards hiemalis. But to be absolutely sure, sequencing would be necessary.
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 17:44
Re : Tricharina
We agree. Thanks.