16-09-2025 12:53
Philippe PELLICIERPézizes de 1-4 mm, brun grisâtres, sur les capsu
03-09-2025 12:44
Enrique Rubio
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o
15-09-2025 14:40
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Hello.I'm searching for a digital copy of the seco
14-09-2025 22:16
Philippe PELLICIERApothécies petites jusquà 3 mm, oranges, avec de
13-09-2025 14:01
Thomas Flammerdark brown apothecia, splitIKI-Spores biguttulate
10-09-2025 17:18
Blasco Rafael
Hola, encontre este estiercol de vaca estos apotec
13-09-2025 14:10
Wim de GrootWe found this hymenoscyphus on rubus fruticulosis.
11-09-2025 16:57
Jason Karakehian
Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is
10-09-2025 23:53
Marcel Heyligen
Found on Robinia pseudoacasia together with Diapor
02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903
Tricharina
Patrice TANCHAUD,
17-01-2024 22:54
Bonsoir,
récolte au sol, apothécie 8 mm pour la plus grande, spores 16-19 x 9,5-11 µm.
J'y verrais bien Tricharina praecox...
Merci d'avance pour vos avis éventuels.
Patrice
Merci d'avance pour vos avis éventuels.
Patrice
Doc1-0077.pdf
Patrice TANCHAUD,
17-01-2024 23:26
Re : Tricharina
En poursuivant les recherches, je vois que T. ochroleuca pourrait être un bon prétendant...
A voir.
Uwe Lindemann,
18-01-2024 14:40
Re : Tricharina
Hi Patrice,
T. ochroleuca is a nomen dubium.
Regarding the shape of the ascospores I would suggest hiemalis, subhiemals or tophiseda. Did you use the key in the following paper? https://ascomycete.org/Journal/Article/art-0363
Best, Uwe
T. ochroleuca is a nomen dubium.
Regarding the shape of the ascospores I would suggest hiemalis, subhiemals or tophiseda. Did you use the key in the following paper? https://ascomycete.org/Journal/Article/art-0363
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD,
19-01-2024 10:31
Re : Tricharina
Many thanks Uwe for this reference, I had not considered this publication, although it is of great importance given the quality of the work with sequencing. The spores, without guttules or granules, seem to eliminate T. tophiseda, then concluding between T. hiemalis and T. subhiemalis seems more difficult without DNA.
Uwe Lindemann,
19-01-2024 12:37
Re : Tricharina
Because of the spore quotient, I would tend towards hiemalis. But to be absolutely sure, sequencing would be necessary.
Best, Uwe
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD,
19-01-2024 17:44
Re : Tricharina
We agree. Thanks.