20-12-2025 23:08
Patrice TANCHAUDBonsoir, récolte sur sol sablonneux dans l'arriÃ
20-12-2025 15:47
Mirek GrycHi.These grew on pine wood that was heavily covere
18-12-2025 21:17
Pol DebaenstThe identification took me to Byssonectria deformi
15-12-2025 07:09
Danny Newman
indet. Rutstroemiaceae sp. on unk. fallen leavesMc
19-12-2025 10:10
Patrice TANCHAUDBonjour, récolte réalisée en milieu dunaire, a
18-12-2025 17:23
Bruno Coué
Bonjour,je serais heureux d'avoir votre avis sur c
18-12-2025 18:07
Margot en Geert VullingsThese plumes were found on rotten wood.They strong
17-12-2025 18:35
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour à tous/Hi to everyone I am passing along
Perrotia flammea?
Nogueira Héctor,
09-11-2023 17:35
On branch of Betula sp in Argañoso (León) Spain.
The largest specimens barely exceed 1 mm. There is no reaction to the meltzer at the apex of the asci, measured in water: (97.9) 101.4 - 119.2 (126.1) × (7.2) 8.5 - 9.5 (10.4) µm Q = (10.7) 11.3 - 13.2 (15.4) ; N = 13 Me = 109.8 × 8.9 µm; Qe = 12.4 Some spores with a septum are observed, measured in water: (16.4) 17.6 - 21.3 (23.3) × (3.8) 4.1 - 4.7 (5.1) µm Q = (3.6) 3.8 - 5 (5.6) ; N = 51 Me = 19.6 × 4.5 µm; Qe = 4.4
Although everything would point to Perrotia flammea, the size of the spores seems a little big to me, I don't know if it is really significant.
What do you think ?
Thanks and regards!
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-11-2023 17:49
Re : Perrotia flammea?
Yes, perfect. In my compound description I noted for 12-13 collections:
 *((9.5–))(12–)13–18(–20)((–24)) {12} × 3–3.6 {4} or 3.7–4.7(–5.2)((–6)) µm {9}
and for five
†(10–)12–17.5 {5} × 3–3.5 {2} or 3.5–4.3(–4.7) µm {3}
Nogueira Héctor,
09-11-2023 17:53
Re : Perrotia flammea?
Perfect! Thank you very much for the help and prompt attention. Greetings!