Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

22-04-2025 14:19

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour à tous, Je sollicite votre aide et vos r

22-04-2025 09:35

François Bartholomeeusen

Dear forum members, Can someone help me!On April

22-04-2025 10:37

François Bartholomeeusen

Also found on April 18, 2025 on an old seed-pod of

29-03-2025 05:45

Sebastien Basso

Hello, I'm conducting a mycological inventory in

21-04-2025 10:52

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

me mandan el material de Galicia (España), recole

18-04-2025 23:16

Robin Pétermann Robin Pétermann

Bonjour, Voici une probable Mollisia, genre que j

19-04-2025 20:48

Per Marstad Per Marstad

Dear Ascofrance. I have not posted pyrenos for a l

19-04-2025 18:58

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour,Je recherche l'article suivant :  ... K

19-04-2025 08:51

Henri Koskinen

Could you help me in the right direction with this

18-04-2025 21:54

Hartmut Schubert Hartmut Schubert

Hi Forum,I found this aquatic pyrenomycete a few d

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC, 14-04-2009 22:10
hello forum,

i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...

best

dirk