15-12-2025 07:09
Danny Newman
indet. Rutstroemiaceae sp. on unk. fallen leavesMc
15-12-2025 11:49
Danny Newman
ITS sequences from the following two collections B
15-12-2025 07:05
Danny Newman
Pseudosclerococcum golindoi (det: Zotto)near Cosb
09-12-2025 12:06
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Je recherche l'article concernant Hypobryo
12-12-2025 18:39
Mirek GrycHello everyone.Macrofeatures similar to Mollisia b
07-12-2025 16:07
Arnold BüschlenHallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiphy
08-12-2025 21:04
Mark Stevens"Hello everyone,I'm relatively new to microscopy (
08-12-2025 18:59
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. found by a seminar-participant, I do not know t
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC,
14-04-2009 22:10
i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...
best
dirk