Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

15-12-2025 07:09

Danny Newman Danny Newman

indet. Rutstroemiaceae sp. on unk. fallen leavesMc

15-12-2025 11:49

Danny Newman Danny Newman

ITS sequences from the following two collections B

15-12-2025 07:05

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Pseudosclerococcum golindoi (det: Zotto)near Cosb

09-12-2025 12:06

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour,Je recherche l'article concernant Hypobryo

13-12-2025 17:26

Buckwheat Pete

Hello everyone,I have a rather interesting ascomyc

13-12-2025 11:58

Mirek Gryc

HiSupposedly this is a species that occurs quite o

12-12-2025 18:39

Mirek Gryc

Hello everyone.Macrofeatures similar to Mollisia b

07-12-2025 16:07

Arnold Büschlen

Hallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiphy

08-12-2025 21:04

Mark Stevens

"Hello everyone,I'm relatively new to microscopy (

08-12-2025 18:59

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

.. found by a seminar-participant, I do not know t

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC, 14-04-2009 22:10
hello forum,

i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...

best

dirk