12-01-2026 22:02
Ethan CrensonHello all, I am hoping someone will have some ins
11-01-2026 20:35
Josep Torres
Hello.A very tiny pyrenomycete sprouting sparsely
12-01-2026 05:24
Danny Newman
Cyathicula coronata on Urtica dioicaCataloochee Di
15-12-2025 11:49
Danny Newman
ITS sequences from the following two collections B
09-01-2026 17:41
Arnold BüschlenHallo, F. dilatata wird von vielen Bryoparasiten
10-01-2026 20:00
Tom SchrierHi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur
07-01-2026 22:22
Danny Newman
Tatraea sp. on indet. hardwood The Swag, Great Sm
10-01-2026 01:18
Danny Newman
cf. Neovaginatispora fuckelii on indet. shrub Pre
07-01-2026 10:24
Danny Newman
Pezicula sp. on indet. hardwood Appalachian Highl
09-01-2026 10:08
Blasco Rafael
Hola, en el mismo habitat que la anteriorRetamaDia
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC,
14-04-2009 22:10
i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...
best
dirk