Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

19-11-2011 17:37

Jac Gelderblom

Chers amisJ'ai trouvé, immergé dans  une tige d

18-11-2011 16:58

Michel RIMBAUD

Bonjour,J'ai récolté ce champignon qui poussait

11-11-2011 16:13

Yatsiuk Iryna Yatsiuk Iryna

Good evening! There is one more finding, from dea

10-11-2011 18:29

Yatsiuk Iryna Yatsiuk Iryna

Dear friends, There is one more tiny discomycete

15-11-2011 16:53

Luc Bailly Luc Bailly

La dernière pour aujourd'hui.A la face inférieur

15-11-2011 16:46

Luc Bailly Luc Bailly

Encore deux récoltes de coelomycètes avant de pa

15-11-2011 12:40

Luc Bailly Luc Bailly

Bonjour à tous,20.10.11. Sur tige morte de Chaero

14-11-2011 16:40

Luc Bailly Luc Bailly

Bonjour à tous,A la fin de la saison, le temps es

14-11-2011 17:36

Luc Bailly Luc Bailly

Le dernier pour aujourd'hui.Acervules brun datte c

14-11-2011 16:49

Luc Bailly Luc Bailly

Sur feuilles de Carpinus betulus, pycnides brun fo

« < 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 > »
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC, 14-04-2009 22:10
hello forum,

i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...

best

dirk