Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

09-01-2026 17:41

Arnold Büschlen

Hallo, F. dilatata wird von vielen Bryoparasiten

10-01-2026 20:00

Tom Schrier

Hi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur

07-01-2026 22:22

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Tatraea sp. on indet. hardwood The Swag, Great Sm

10-01-2026 01:18

Danny Newman Danny Newman

cf. Neovaginatispora fuckelii on indet. shrub Pre

07-01-2026 10:24

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Pezicula sp. on indet. hardwood Appalachian Highl

09-01-2026 10:08

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, en el mismo habitat que la anteriorRetamaDia

08-01-2026 21:22

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, He recogido esta muestra de Orbilia sobre Re

07-01-2026 17:29

Marc Detollenaere Marc Detollenaere

Dear Forum,On a barkless Populus I found some smal

10-11-2021 17:33

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Add-on topic http://www.ascofrance.com/forum/7059

07-01-2026 10:05

Danny Newman Danny Newman

cf. Chaetospermum on XylariaCosby Campground, Grea

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC, 14-04-2009 22:10
hello forum,

i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...

best

dirk