Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

25-03-2026 13:54

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Does anyone know where I could download Paoletti's

25-03-2026 15:46

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Je sollicite de l'aide pour cette récol

25-03-2026 15:06

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me confirm

25-03-2026 10:35

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello,I collected this species growing on a dead b

24-03-2026 19:59

William Slosse William Slosse

Hello everyone,On 23/03/26, I found the following

21-03-2026 15:13

Lepista Zacarias

Hello everyone, Does any one know of any literatu

24-03-2026 21:37

Elisabeth Stöckli

Bonsoir,Sur bois (tronc) très pourri de conifère

24-03-2026 21:07

Ethan Crenson

Hello all, A friend collected this asco in a wood

23-03-2026 20:16

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o

24-03-2026 15:44

Åge Oterhals

I hope someone can confirm the name of this collec

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC, 14-04-2009 22:10
hello forum,

i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...

best

dirk