24-03-2026 21:37
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur bois (tronc) très pourri de conifère
25-03-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a dead b
26-03-2026 15:31
Åke Widgren
Hello,I found this one in October last year, on r
25-03-2026 22:23
Marc Detollenaere
Dear Forum,On a debarked stem of Tilia, we found s
24-03-2026 15:44
Åge OterhalsI hope someone can confirm the name of this collec
25-03-2026 20:53
François BartholomeeusenDear forum members,On 23 March 2026, I found sever
23-03-2026 20:16
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o
25-03-2026 15:06
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me confirm
On 5 August 2022, a friend gave me a piece of a branch of Ulmus (13 cm long, 2.5 cm in diameter) covered with an anamorph. Under those white/pink spots, the bark was covered with green algae and lichens.
The conidia with 1 sept (slightly off-centre and slightly contracted there) have the following dimensions: 20.3 - 24.5 × 10.6 - 12.7 µm; Q = 1.8 - 2.2 ; Me = 22.5 × 11.6 µm .
When wiping off those downy spots I found white bumps in the bark, under which were black perithecia with 1 ostiole that contained very dark spores with following dimensions:
43 - 55.5 × 18.6 - 22.6 µm; Q = 2 - 2.7; Me = 50 × 20.9 µm.
Due to the age of the branch, the prevailing dryness and heat, the material to be examined was in poor condition. With the key of ME Barr Mycotaxon Vol XV 1982 I could identify the ascomata as: Splanchnonema foedans.
My question is twofold: 1) Can someone confirm my determination?
2) Is the anamorph related to S. foedans and can it be identified?
Many thanks in advance,
François Bartholomeeusen
This is Splanchnonema foedans indeed, most probably a new species for Flanders.
The anamorph is Arthobotrys-like.
All the best,
Bernard
Despite the poor condition of the substrate, this is still a good find. Your choice for Arthrobotrys is more than plausible. I'm leaving for a week in the coolness of the coast and will try to elaborate on this find upon my return.
Thanks again for your reaction,
François













