Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

27-01-2026 11:43

DNA match
Malcolm Greaves Malcolm Greaves

Is anyone with experience of DNA testing able to t

25-01-2026 16:08

Geoglossum
Malcolm Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Geoglossum had spores mostly 70-80 (87) with

26-01-2026 11:49

Anamorph on Cytisus
Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this possible anamorph on a dead Cytisus

25-01-2026 23:23

Delitschia/Lojkania? on wood
Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

Hello! I found this species that resembles Delitsc

18-01-2026 12:24

Anamorph on an olive tree
Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.An anamorph located on the surface of a thin

23-01-2026 21:50

Looking for a paper please
Cameron DK

I am looking for this please publication. is anyon

10-01-2026 20:00

Lichenicolous fungus on Protoparmeliopsis muralis
Tom Schrier

Hi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur

21-01-2026 19:55

Nemania aureolutea?
Bohan Jia

Hi,  Could this be Nemania aureolutea? Or did I

21-01-2026 16:32

Lichenicolous coelomycete
Gernot Friebes

Hi,I need your help with some black dots on a lich

21-01-2026 16:48

Hyphomycete on Rubus fruticosus agg.
Gernot Friebes

Hi,after my last unknown hyphomycete on this subst

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Rutstroemia firma ou Rutstroemia alni ?
Bernard CLESSE, 18-02-2022 16:40
Bernard CLESSESur brindille morte de feuillu (non identifié mais peut-être d'aulne glutineux ?) au fond d'une vallée.


Dans l'eau, les spores font (sans les appendices) : 20-24x7-8,5 µm et les asques : 150-181x10-15 µm.


Je n'arrive pas à choisir entre Rutstroemia firma et Rutstroemia alni.

Merci pour vos conseils !

Bernard

  • message #71867
  • message #71867
  • message #71867
  • message #71867
  • message #71867
Hans-Otto Baral, 18-02-2022 20:44
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Rutstroemia firma ou Rutstroemia alni ?
Neither of them. I suspect R. bolaris on Carpinus. You must study the ectal excipulum, is it of isodiametrical cells or prismatica?

R. alni has spores *17-24 x 7-9 (matching yours, whereas R. firma has *15-23 x 4.5-6. R. alni occurs with multiguttulate spores as well as with two large and many small LBs. No idea if this has something to say. In R. firma I never saw multiguttulate spores, which are characteristic of R. bolaris.

One reason for R. bolaris is, that you found it now. It is a sprin fungus, though my notes say III-IV. R. alni and R. forma are autumn fungi.

Try to find out the host, with a radial section it is easy to recognize Alnus by the ladder-like perforations that Carpinus does not have.
Bernard CLESSE, 18-02-2022 21:01
Bernard CLESSE
Re : Rutstroemia firma ou Rutstroemia alni ?
Yes Zotto, you are absolutely right. I was too quick in my conclusions and I had forgotten Rutstroemia bolaris which I nevertheless collected several times. Andgelo Mombert also put me back on the right track.

Kind regards,

Bernard
Michel Hairaud, 20-02-2022 21:25
Michel Hairaud
Re : Rutstroemia firma ou Rutstroemia alni ?
Bonsoir, 
Of course I approve R. bolaris . I only want to add that we regularly collect it in Februrary (in West of France) and even earlier than Bernard's find 
Michel
Bernard CLESSE, 20-02-2022 21:30
Bernard CLESSE
Re : Rutstroemia firma ou Rutstroemia alni ?
Grand merci pour ton info sur la phénologie de cette espèce, Michel ! 

Je me rappellerai de cet élément important signalé par Zotto et que tu me confirmes aussi !

Bien amicalement,

Bernard
Michel Hairaud, 20-02-2022 22:15
Michel Hairaud
Re : Rutstroemia firma ou Rutstroemia alni ?
Donc à l'année prochaine même époque, Bernard sur ce forum ? -:) Michel