05-07-2025 12:38
Åge OterhalsI found this pyrenomycetous fungi in pine forest o
02-07-2025 18:45
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur feuilles d'Osmunda regalis (Saulaie),
04-07-2025 20:12
Josep Torres
Hello.A fungus growing on the surface of a trunk o
20-06-2025 08:33
Josep Torres
Hello.Small, blackish, mucronated surface grains s
28-06-2025 16:00
Josep Torres
Hello.A tiny fungus shaped like globose black grai
04-07-2025 12:43
Castillo Joseba
me mandan el material seco de Galicia (España)
Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
Nedim Jukic,
30-10-2021 15:09
Hi all,Does anyone have any idea about genus ID of this small fungus (0.1 mm in diam) found on Conocephalum sp.?
It has been found on 25th of July this year at 1700 m asl on the glacial lake shore in central Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Here is data about spores size:
(12.5) 13.3 - 19.8 (21) × (2.4) 2.6 - 3.5 (4.4) µm
Q = (3.8) 4.8 - 6.7 (7.7) ; N = 20
Me = 16.5 × 3 µm ; Qe = 5.5
Cheers,
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-10-2021 16:55
Re : Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
I only know Bryoscyphus marchantiae on that substrate, but the narrow spores and shape of apical rin are totally different.
Any idea of the paraphyses and their contents? No hairs?
Zotto
Nedim Jukic,
30-10-2021 17:20
Re : Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
Hi Zotto,
Thanks for you comment.
As a matter of fact I have noticed one hair but I was not sure whether or not it come from fungi or something else.
Here is some more photos, some with paraphyses but not clearly visible.
Looks like there is some disperse content and not concentrate refreactive VBs.
I am familiar with B. marchantiae, and besides differences you have mentioned this one is way to smaller.
Cheers,
Thanks for you comment.
As a matter of fact I have noticed one hair but I was not sure whether or not it come from fungi or something else.
Here is some more photos, some with paraphyses but not clearly visible.
Looks like there is some disperse content and not concentrate refreactive VBs.
I am familiar with B. marchantiae, and besides differences you have mentioned this one is way to smaller.
Cheers,
