24-07-2024 13:19
Thomas FlammerI am looking for a PDF of the above article. Thank
21-07-2024 10:13
Thierry Blondelle
Bonjour,Récolte sur branchette de Castanea dans u
21-07-2024 10:28
Alan Rockefeller
Which Peziza did I find on horse dung in Humboldt
19-07-2024 11:08
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Good morningThis Scutellinia from July 9 grew at 1
21-07-2024 06:23
Masanori KutsunaDear all, Does anyone have these papers and send
08-07-2024 23:34
Villalonga PacoSmall Scutellinia growing in garden soil (calcareo
Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
Nedim Jukic,
30-10-2021 15:09
Hi all,Does anyone have any idea about genus ID of this small fungus (0.1 mm in diam) found on Conocephalum sp.?
It has been found on 25th of July this year at 1700 m asl on the glacial lake shore in central Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Here is data about spores size:
(12.5) 13.3 - 19.8 (21) × (2.4) 2.6 - 3.5 (4.4) µm
Q = (3.8) 4.8 - 6.7 (7.7) ; N = 20
Me = 16.5 × 3 µm ; Qe = 5.5
Cheers,
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-10-2021 16:55
Re : Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
I only know Bryoscyphus marchantiae on that substrate, but the narrow spores and shape of apical rin are totally different.
Any idea of the paraphyses and their contents? No hairs?
Zotto
Nedim Jukic,
30-10-2021 17:20
Re : Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
Hi Zotto,
Thanks for you comment.
As a matter of fact I have noticed one hair but I was not sure whether or not it come from fungi or something else.
Here is some more photos, some with paraphyses but not clearly visible.
Looks like there is some disperse content and not concentrate refreactive VBs.
I am familiar with B. marchantiae, and besides differences you have mentioned this one is way to smaller.
Cheers,
Thanks for you comment.
As a matter of fact I have noticed one hair but I was not sure whether or not it come from fungi or something else.
Here is some more photos, some with paraphyses but not clearly visible.
Looks like there is some disperse content and not concentrate refreactive VBs.
I am familiar with B. marchantiae, and besides differences you have mentioned this one is way to smaller.
Cheers,
