12-11-2019 10:32
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Hi againExactly at the same place than my previous
25-12-2019 17:54
Valencia Lopez Francisco JavierHola a todos/asEstas supuestas pezizas estaban en
28-07-2011 18:31
Alex Akulov
Dear FriendsToday I made the pdf file of Velenovsk
12-07-2015 00:05
Nedim Jukic
This one from the same locality as the previous on
30-05-2026 21:12
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,
31-05-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a rather
25-05-2026 16:35
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,
29-05-2026 15:35
daniel FERREBonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre aide pour cette
Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
Nedim Jukic,
30-10-2021 15:09
Hi all,Does anyone have any idea about genus ID of this small fungus (0.1 mm in diam) found on Conocephalum sp.?
It has been found on 25th of July this year at 1700 m asl on the glacial lake shore in central Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Here is data about spores size:
(12.5) 13.3 - 19.8 (21) × (2.4) 2.6 - 3.5 (4.4) µm
Q = (3.8) 4.8 - 6.7 (7.7) ; N = 20
Me = 16.5 × 3 µm ; Qe = 5.5
Cheers,
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-10-2021 16:55
Re : Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
I only know Bryoscyphus marchantiae on that substrate, but the narrow spores and shape of apical rin are totally different.
Any idea of the paraphyses and their contents? No hairs?
Zotto
Nedim Jukic,
30-10-2021 17:20
Re : Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
Hi Zotto,
Thanks for you comment.
As a matter of fact I have noticed one hair but I was not sure whether or not it come from fungi or something else.
Here is some more photos, some with paraphyses but not clearly visible.
Looks like there is some disperse content and not concentrate refreactive VBs.
I am familiar with B. marchantiae, and besides differences you have mentioned this one is way to smaller.
Cheers,
Thanks for you comment.
As a matter of fact I have noticed one hair but I was not sure whether or not it come from fungi or something else.
Here is some more photos, some with paraphyses but not clearly visible.
Looks like there is some disperse content and not concentrate refreactive VBs.
I am familiar with B. marchantiae, and besides differences you have mentioned this one is way to smaller.
Cheers,
