
01-05-2025 20:11

Hello, today I have collected a tiny ascomycete g

27-04-2025 15:54

Can somebody provide this article from a Leningrad

29-04-2025 09:13
Louis DENYBonjour forumVosges du sud, ballon d'Alsace altitu

04-05-2025 11:37

Hello,yesterday I took an attached branch of Querc

02-05-2025 08:41
Tony MoverleyA Monilinia type fungus has recently been collecte

02-05-2025 08:45
Isabelle CharissouBonjour, existe-t-il un pdf d'un Glossarium polygl

03-05-2025 12:43

Hi together, Maybe someone has an idea about this

01-05-2025 11:25

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à

01-05-2025 21:07
Isabelle CharissouBonjour, j'aimerais pouvoir consulter l'article s

Ascospores in this collection measure (15.6) 16.2 - 19.9 (20.5) × (5.8) 6 - 7.2 (7.4) µm, Q = (2.3) 2.33 - 3.1 (3.4). Me = 17.9 × 6.7 µm; Qe = 2.7. They are first hyaline, then brownish, one-septate, very finely punctate. I have measured the width in the thickest part, not in the constriction.
I am not sure whether to determine it as M. leptosphaeriae or M. sphaeriae. Fungi of temperate Europe state these two taxa are perhaps identical, but Grafenhan et al. 2011 distinguish them as two species. They write: "The distinction between Macroconia leptosphaeriae and
M. sphaeriae is based on the size of ascospores and conidia in the
type collections. According to Wollenweber (1926), the ascospores
of the type material of M. leptosphaeriae are smaller (14–18 ×
5–5.5 µm) than those of M. sphaeriae (19–25 × 5.8–6.5 µm)."
Unfortunatelly I haven´t encountered any conidia, so I have to rely on ascospores. However, my values are between the values for the two species given by Wollenweber. Maybe this author measured dead ascospores (therefore smaller than my vital ones - then my collection would better fit M. leptosphaeriae)?
Thanks, Zuzana


Thank you very much for your reply. No existence of M. sphaeriae would make it much easier.
Zuzana