13-05-2026 15:26
François Freléchoux
Bonjour,Voici une récolte faite il y a quelques j
12-05-2026 15:41
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Dear Ascolovers, especially interested in Pezizale
13-05-2026 12:05
Thierry Blondelle
Bonjour à tous,J'aimerais avoir confirmation de c
11-05-2026 12:32
Bernard CLESSE
Pourriez-vous m'aider à identifier cette héloti
10-05-2026 23:17
Andreas Gminder
Hello,today we found in a moist steep decidous for
28-04-2026 20:07
Lothar Krieglsteiner
... on twig in the air at standing Ceratonia siliq
27-04-2026 20:52
Lothar Krieglsteiner
Found on hanging tiwg of Olea europaea in dried-ou
11-05-2026 20:22
Lothar Krieglsteiner
on attached twig of standing Ficus caricaquite uns
29-04-2026 10:44
Lothar Krieglsteiner
growing at moist, drying-out soil at the side of a
Eutypa sparsa?
Mirek Gryc,
14-10-2021 12:50
This is my first genre from this kind so I am asking for understanding. I tried to show all relevant features in the pictures.
Ascomata grew on Fraxinus sp.
Reaction to negative iodine.
Features match the Eutypa sparsa but I have not found information to grow on Fraxinus. From what I read to his basic substrate is: Populus and Salix.
Any aid is welcome.
regards
Mirek
Eduard Osieck,
14-10-2021 15:31
Re : Eutypa sparsa?
Hi Mirek
On Fraxinus the occurrence of E. leptoplaca is more likely although this species shows an amyloid apical ring (but difficult to see, cf. http://www.ascofrance.com/search_forum/27030).
For proper identification some more features are needed: cross section through the stroma (cf. 8th photo in an earlier topic: http://www.ascofrance.com/search_forum/37352), diameter of perithecia, and diameter of papillae (aka ostioles in the key of Rappaz 1987).
Eduard
Mirek Gryc,
14-10-2021 20:46
Re : Eutypa sparsa?
Hi Eduard
This is not an easy to microscopy. The more greater I had a problem with taking photos with my imperfect equipment.
However, you have to believe that after processing samples in KOH saw a beautiful blue reaction.
I showed a few measurements in the pictures.
Diameter of papillae <100µm
Diameter of perithecia <300 µm
I think these features confirm your type but because of the lack of experience I would prefer to hear the opinion of more experienced people.
I place a few more images.
Thank you for tips and help.
regards
Mirek
This is not an easy to microscopy. The more greater I had a problem with taking photos with my imperfect equipment.
However, you have to believe that after processing samples in KOH saw a beautiful blue reaction.
I showed a few measurements in the pictures.
Diameter of papillae <100µm
Diameter of perithecia <300 µm
I think these features confirm your type but because of the lack of experience I would prefer to hear the opinion of more experienced people.
I place a few more images.
Thank you for tips and help.
regards
Mirek
