02-06-2026 14:33
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Hello.I'm searching for a PDF copy of the followin
02-06-2026 17:58
Louis DENYBonjour forum, Sur feuille de Populus tremula, en
28-07-2011 18:31
Alex Akulov
Dear FriendsToday I made the pdf file of Velenovsk
11-09-2025 16:57
Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is
12-11-2019 10:32
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Hi againExactly at the same place than my previous
25-12-2019 17:54
Valencia Lopez Francisco JavierHola a todos/asEstas supuestas pezizas estaban en
12-07-2015 00:05
Nedim Jukic
This one from the same locality as the previous on
30-05-2026 21:12
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,
Boubovia (?) on dung
Koszka Attila,
15-11-2019 19:48
Bonjour!
I found today this Boubovia-like fungus on horse dung.
The hooked paraphyses reminded me of Pulvinula.
The fruitbodies 0,5-1,5 mm in diameter.
Asci operculate, inamyloid, 80-130 micrometers long, base rather with croziers.
Spores 11-13 x 6,5-8 micrometers, wall completely smooth in cotton blue, some with
a weak guttule.
I found Boubovia nicholsoni in the literature, wich fits well to my fungus, but the
substrate is strange.
Is this determination (Boubovia nicholsoni) correct?
Josep Torres,
15-11-2019 21:30
Re : Boubovia (?) on dung
Has considerado Coprotus, quizás Coprotus aurora?
http://www.outerhebridesfungi.co.uk/species.php?id=354
Saludos.
http://www.outerhebridesfungi.co.uk/species.php?id=354
Saludos.
Koszka Attila,
15-11-2019 22:47
Re : Boubovia (?) on dung
Wow, it fits very well, thank you!
Peter Welt,
17-11-2019 13:10
Re : Boubovia (?) on dung
In fact it is a species of the genus Coprotus. However, the 1.5 mm apothecaries are very large for this genus and the paraphyses are unusually curved. Not seen yet. So you can really think of Boubovia. I have to work on my key to work out the differences. However, Boubovia is very, very rarely on dung.
Here you will find a great key to Coprotus: https://mycokeys.pensoft.net/article/22978/
Peter
Koszka Attila,
18-11-2019 19:20
Re : Boubovia (?) on dung
Dear Peter!
I misjudged the size of fruitbodies, in fact they were 0,3-0,9 mm in diameter.
Unfortunately I did not examine the marginal cells of my collection,
but (based on the key You linked) now I see the importance of this character.
Thank You for the key and the help!
Attila

