Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

27-02-2026 17:51

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Quelqu'un peut il me donner un conseil p

28-02-2026 15:52

Spooren Marco Spooren Marco

Who has an idea ? I have no coupes made for conid

28-02-2026 14:43

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

A new refrence desired :Svanidze, T.V. (1984) Novy

28-02-2026 11:54

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

Hi forum,Is anyone aware if the 1936 edition of Si

28-02-2026 11:05

Yanick BOULANGER

Bonjour à tousLe 24/02/2026 à Montmacq, devant m

29-11-2024 21:47

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourJ'avais un deuxième échantillon moins mat

27-02-2026 16:17

Mathias Hass Mathias Hass

Hi, Found this on Betula, rather fresh fallen twi

27-02-2026 12:56

Åge Oterhals

Found on fallen cones of Pinus sylvestris in midle

27-02-2026 11:21

Yannick Mourgues Yannick Mourgues

Hi to all. Here is a specie that can may be relat

26-02-2026 22:06

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

Can someone explain the features that split Geoscy

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Pyrenochaete fallax
Eduard Osieck, 06-05-2019 17:43
This Pyrenochaete collection comes from Urtica.
Setae septate 80-250 um, conidia 5-6 x 2 um.

The characters match well with Pyrenochaet fallax as described by Ellis & Ellis 1997. The host listing of Urtica dioica in the US fungal database (https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/) includes only this Pyrenochaete. Furthermore, Schneider 1979 (Die Gattung Pyrenochaete De Notaris,) mentions only one other Pyrenochaete collected on Urtica: P. rhenana but this species has long hairs forming a subiculum.


Can somebody comment on or confirm this identification?


Thanks in advance, Eduard

  • message #57594
  • message #57594
  • message #57594
  • message #57594