Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

07-12-2025 16:07

Arnold Büschlen

Hallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiphy

08-12-2025 21:04

Mark Stevens

"Hello everyone,I'm relatively new to microscopy (

09-12-2025 12:06

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour,Je recherche l'article concernant Hypobryo

08-12-2025 18:59

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

.. found by a seminar-participant, I do not know t

08-12-2025 21:18

Buckwheat Pete

Hello everyone, Is it possible to at least approx

07-12-2025 17:43

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Helvella was in mixed woodland. Uniform cupul

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

16-03-2014 22:00

Ralph Vandiest Ralph Vandiest

Hello,I found this species a few months ago but ha

08-12-2025 13:39

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10572899

07-12-2025 22:43

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening, tried to determine with Munks Valsa

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Pyrenochaete fallax
Eduard Osieck, 06-05-2019 17:43
This Pyrenochaete collection comes from Urtica.
Setae septate 80-250 um, conidia 5-6 x 2 um.

The characters match well with Pyrenochaet fallax as described by Ellis & Ellis 1997. The host listing of Urtica dioica in the US fungal database (https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/) includes only this Pyrenochaete. Furthermore, Schneider 1979 (Die Gattung Pyrenochaete De Notaris,) mentions only one other Pyrenochaete collected on Urtica: P. rhenana but this species has long hairs forming a subiculum.


Can somebody comment on or confirm this identification?


Thanks in advance, Eduard

  • message #57594
  • message #57594
  • message #57594
  • message #57594