Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

27-11-2025 12:01

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727

27-11-2025 11:46

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918

17-09-2025 10:50

Heather Merrylees

Hi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif

29-11-2025 08:40

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Hello,on a splintered part of a branch on the grou

28-11-2025 16:45

Nogueira Héctor

November 23, 2025 Requejo de Sanabria (León) SPAI

25-11-2025 14:24

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522

27-11-2025 15:41

Thomas Læssøe

Spores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;

27-11-2025 11:31

Thomas Læssøe

Collectors notes: Immersed ascomata, erumpent thro

23-09-2025 13:31

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623

26-11-2025 18:13

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

The entire run of Mycotaxon is now available throu

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Pyrenochaete fallax
Eduard Osieck, 06-05-2019 17:43
This Pyrenochaete collection comes from Urtica.
Setae septate 80-250 um, conidia 5-6 x 2 um.

The characters match well with Pyrenochaet fallax as described by Ellis & Ellis 1997. The host listing of Urtica dioica in the US fungal database (https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/) includes only this Pyrenochaete. Furthermore, Schneider 1979 (Die Gattung Pyrenochaete De Notaris,) mentions only one other Pyrenochaete collected on Urtica: P. rhenana but this species has long hairs forming a subiculum.


Can somebody comment on or confirm this identification?


Thanks in advance, Eduard

  • message #57594
  • message #57594
  • message #57594
  • message #57594