Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

03-09-2025 12:44

Ascolichen on Blechnum?
Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o

15-09-2025 14:40

Engler & Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam. (Ed. 2) 1938
Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Hello.I'm searching for a digital copy of the seco

14-09-2025 22:16

Cheilymenia stercorea
Philippe PELLICIER

Apothécies petites jusquà 3 mm, oranges, avec de

13-09-2025 14:01

Otidea platyspora or something else?
Thomas Flammer

dark brown apothecia, splitIKI-Spores biguttulate

10-09-2025 17:18

Pseudocoprotus catenipilus ???
Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, encontre este estiercol de vaca estos apotec

13-09-2025 14:10

Hymenoscyphus on Rubus
Wim de Groot

We found this hymenoscyphus on rubus fruticulosis.

11-09-2025 16:57

Marthamycetales revision published
Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is

10-09-2025 23:53

Strickeria kochii?
Marcel Heyligen Marcel Heyligen

Found on Robinia pseudoacasia together with Diapor

02-09-2025 11:34

dark- and small-spored Sordariomycetes on Fraxinus - Denmark
Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903

07-09-2025 08:19

Hymenoscyphus?
Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.Tiny pinkish discomycetes, photographed and

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Another Lachnum for identification
Jan Knuiman, 30-06-2018 14:36
Growing on a rotten twig of a broadleaf tree (Salix, Populus, Betula) in a moist environment. This one grew very close to that of my previous topic on Lachnum (29-06-2018).
Cup diameter: max 1 mm.
Stipe height: 0.5-1.0 mm.
Spores: 6.5-9.5 x 1.4-2.4 µm.
Paraphyses: sometimes with a swollen part and protruding the asci by 20 -25 µm. Width: 3.0-7.5 µm.
Hairs: with septa and a maximum length of 60 µm.
Crouziers: I would guess yes.

What Lachnum species could this be?


Jan

  • message #53955
  • message #53955
  • message #53955
  • message #53955
  • message #53955
  • message #53955
Hans-Otto Baral, 30-06-2018 14:44
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Another Lachnum for identification
Croziers are cleary visible on your beforelast photo. I guess again L. pubescens. L. subvirgineum has longer, more capitate hairs

Zotto
Jan Knuiman, 30-06-2018 15:14
Re : Another Lachnum for identification
Thanks Zotto for your quick reply!
Jan
Hans-Otto Baral, 30-06-2018 16:20
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Another Lachnum for identification
I have a folder "pubescens cf., salicis, Salix" on my homepage which includes samples on Salix (but the type of L. pubescens was also on Salix and might be the same).

Salix and Populus are not easy to distinguish from the wood anatomy, but Betula is quite different.
Hans-Otto Baral, 05-03-2025 21:16
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Another Lachnum for identification
Dear Jan

I would like to upload your two sequences for an article on Lachnum in Boletus. Did you receive my mail?

As for LP1 I guess the branch is about 10 mm thick, not 3 mm as I have noted.

The collection data are complete, but I need the institute where Jorinde Nuytinck works.

It should be the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden.

I think I will write her too.

Zotto