23-09-2018 14:10
Rubén Martínez Gil
Hola a todos. Subo unas fotos de una Peziza que e
19-09-2018 15:30
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Bonjour.Je cherche une version digitale de ce docu
23-09-2018 22:21
Marc Detollenaere
Good evening, On dead leaves of Ammophila I found
18-09-2018 14:10
Savic DragisaIs this Pachyella punctispora? I found it on a dam
21-09-2018 23:44
Edouard Evangelisti
Bonjour le forum, Pourriez-vous m'aider à confir
13-09-2018 19:17
Marc Detollenaere
Dear forum, Yesterday I found setous fruit bodies
Another Lachnum for identification
Jan Knuiman,
30-06-2018 14:36
Cup diameter: max 1 mm.
Stipe height: 0.5-1.0 mm.
Spores: 6.5-9.5 x 1.4-2.4 µm.
Paraphyses: sometimes with a swollen part and protruding the asci by 20 -25 µm. Width: 3.0-7.5 µm.
Hairs: with septa and a maximum length of 60 µm.
Crouziers: I would guess yes.
What Lachnum species could this be?
Jan
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-06-2018 14:44
Re : Another Lachnum for identification
Croziers are cleary visible on your beforelast photo. I guess again L. pubescens. L. subvirgineum has longer, more capitate hairs
Zotto
Zotto
Jan Knuiman,
30-06-2018 15:14
Re : Another Lachnum for identification
Thanks Zotto for your quick reply!
Jan
Jan
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-06-2018 16:20
Re : Another Lachnum for identification
I have a folder "pubescens cf., salicis, Salix" on my homepage which includes samples on Salix (but the type of L. pubescens was also on Salix and might be the same).
Salix and Populus are not easy to distinguish from the wood anatomy, but Betula is quite different.
Salix and Populus are not easy to distinguish from the wood anatomy, but Betula is quite different.