
05-07-2025 12:38
Åge OterhalsI found this pyrenomycetous fungi in pine forest o

02-07-2025 18:45
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur feuilles d'Osmunda regalis (Saulaie),

04-07-2025 20:12
Hello.A fungus growing on the surface of a trunk o

20-06-2025 08:33
Hello.Small, blackish, mucronated surface grains s

28-06-2025 16:00
Hello.A tiny fungus shaped like globose black grai

04-07-2025 12:43
me mandan el material seco de Galicia (España)
Another Lachnum for identification
Jan Knuiman,
30-06-2018 14:36
Cup diameter: max 1 mm.
Stipe height: 0.5-1.0 mm.
Spores: 6.5-9.5 x 1.4-2.4 µm.
Paraphyses: sometimes with a swollen part and protruding the asci by 20 -25 µm. Width: 3.0-7.5 µm.
Hairs: with septa and a maximum length of 60 µm.
Crouziers: I would guess yes.
What Lachnum species could this be?
Jan
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-06-2018 14:44

Re : Another Lachnum for identification
Croziers are cleary visible on your beforelast photo. I guess again L. pubescens. L. subvirgineum has longer, more capitate hairs
Zotto
Zotto
Jan Knuiman,
30-06-2018 15:14
Re : Another Lachnum for identification
Thanks Zotto for your quick reply!
Jan
Jan
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-06-2018 16:20

Re : Another Lachnum for identification
I have a folder "pubescens cf., salicis, Salix" on my homepage which includes samples on Salix (but the type of L. pubescens was also on Salix and might be the same).
Salix and Populus are not easy to distinguish from the wood anatomy, but Betula is quite different.
Salix and Populus are not easy to distinguish from the wood anatomy, but Betula is quite different.
Hans-Otto Baral,
05-03-2025 21:16

Re : Another Lachnum for identification
Dear Jan
I would like to upload your two sequences for an article on Lachnum in Boletus. Did you receive my mail?
As for LP1 I guess the branch is about 10 mm thick, not 3 mm as I have noted.
The collection data are complete, but I need the institute where Jorinde Nuytinck works.
It should be the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden.
I think I will write her too.
Zotto