04-11-2025 09:07
Josep Torres
Hello.A suspected Hymenoscyphus sprouting on a thi
04-11-2025 12:43
Edvin Johannesen
Hi! One more found on old Populus tremula log in O
03-11-2025 21:34
Edvin Johannesen
These tiny (0.4-0.5 mm diam.), whitish, short-stip
28-10-2025 15:37
Carl FarmerI'd be grateful for any suggestions for this strik
03-11-2025 16:30
Hans-Otto Baral
Hello I want to ask you if you have found this ye
Another Lachnum for identification
Jan Knuiman,
30-06-2018 14:36
Cup diameter: max 1 mm.
Stipe height: 0.5-1.0 mm.
Spores: 6.5-9.5 x 1.4-2.4 µm.
Paraphyses: sometimes with a swollen part and protruding the asci by 20 -25 µm. Width: 3.0-7.5 µm.
Hairs: with septa and a maximum length of 60 µm.
Crouziers: I would guess yes.
What Lachnum species could this be?
Jan
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-06-2018 14:44
Re : Another Lachnum for identification
Croziers are cleary visible on your beforelast photo. I guess again L. pubescens. L. subvirgineum has longer, more capitate hairs
Zotto
Zotto
Jan Knuiman,
30-06-2018 15:14
Re : Another Lachnum for identification
Thanks Zotto for your quick reply!
Jan
Jan
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-06-2018 16:20
Re : Another Lachnum for identification
I have a folder "pubescens cf., salicis, Salix" on my homepage which includes samples on Salix (but the type of L. pubescens was also on Salix and might be the same).
Salix and Populus are not easy to distinguish from the wood anatomy, but Betula is quite different.
Salix and Populus are not easy to distinguish from the wood anatomy, but Betula is quite different.
Hans-Otto Baral,
05-03-2025 21:16
Re : Another Lachnum for identification
Dear Jan
I would like to upload your two sequences for an article on Lachnum in Boletus. Did you receive my mail?
As for LP1 I guess the branch is about 10 mm thick, not 3 mm as I have noted.
The collection data are complete, but I need the institute where Jorinde Nuytinck works.
It should be the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden.
I think I will write her too.
Zotto