03-05-2026 10:57
Me mandan el material seco de Galicia (España) re
02-05-2026 12:42
Alain BRISSARDBonjour à tousJeuidi 30 avril dernier on m'a remi
02-05-2026 13:06
Pauline. PennaBonjour Please can someone help me with this id
01-05-2026 22:45
Thierry Blondelle
Bonjour à tous, Une récolte sur bouse séchée d
28-04-2026 20:07
Lothar Krieglsteiner
... on twig in the air at standing Ceratonia siliq
14-04-2026 05:32
Ethan CrensonHi all, A few weeks back a friend pointed out som
28-04-2026 20:33
Vitus SchäfftleinHello, I found Trochila ilicina on Ilex aquifoliu
30-04-2026 10:28
Rot BojanHello, by appearance I would say that I am dealing
Another Trichoglossum
Malcolm Greaves,
03-11-2017 01:25
Is there an alternative?
Thanks
Mal
Luc Lenaerts,
03-11-2017 14:45
Re : Another Trichoglossum
Hello,
The only other possibility is Trichoglossum farlowii, but these species has mainly only 0-5-septate spores.
Added the distribution of the lengths of the spores of related species and the distribution of the numbers of septa (in percent) of the spores of the same related species in my collections (in Flanders).
Regards
Luc Lenaerts
The only other possibility is Trichoglossum farlowii, but these species has mainly only 0-5-septate spores.
Added the distribution of the lengths of the spores of related species and the distribution of the numbers of septa (in percent) of the spores of the same related species in my collections (in Flanders).
Regards
Luc Lenaerts
Malcolm Greaves,
03-11-2017 17:02
Re : Another Trichoglossum
Luc
Your data fits well with my find. With the majority of spores c75 and the longest found was 82. Most were 7 septate but there were a few with 6,5 or less septa.
Thanks
Mal
Your data fits well with my find. With the majority of spores c75 and the longest found was 82. Most were 7 septate but there were a few with 6,5 or less septa.
Thanks
Mal
Malcolm Greaves,
06-11-2017 20:11
Re : Another Trichoglossum
Luc
I was just searching further to get the full details before contacting Kew re this find and I found that T confusum is described as being 1.5-2.5 tall whereas T walteri is between 3-10cm. As my specimen was in the region of 8cm tall it would seem to exclued T confusum.
Mal
I was just searching further to get the full details before contacting Kew re this find and I found that T confusum is described as being 1.5-2.5 tall whereas T walteri is between 3-10cm. As my specimen was in the region of 8cm tall it would seem to exclued T confusum.
Mal
Luc Lenaerts,
06-11-2017 23:51
Malcolm Greaves,
07-11-2017 09:08
Re : Another Trichoglossum
Ok that's great Luc.
Thanks
Mal
Thanks
Mal




Doc7-0001.docx