13-02-2026 03:30
Hello! I found these immersed perithecia on a stic
13-02-2026 18:05
Margot en Geert VullingsOn February 9, 2026, we found these small hairy di
12-02-2026 21:34
patrice CallardBonjour, la face inférieure des feuilles ce certa
11-02-2026 22:15
William Slosse
Today, February 11, 2026, we found the following R
12-02-2026 14:55
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10581810
11-02-2026 19:28
Lothar Krieglsteiner
on small deciduous twig on the ground in forest wi
25-04-2025 17:24
Stefan BlaserHi everybody, This collection was collected by J
10-02-2026 17:42
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me donner
Cholorociboria aeruginosa ?
Francisco SÁNCHEZ,
25-01-2017 13:15
Esporas de:
(11.6) 12.5 - 15.9 (17.5) × (2) 2.8 - 3.6 (3.9) µm
Q = (3.3) 3.9 - 5.3 (7.3) ; N = 50
Me = 14.4 × 3.2 µm ; Qe = 4.6
Hans-Otto Baral,
25-01-2017 15:09
Re : Cholorociboria aeruginosa ?
Yes, it is very clearly C. aeruginosa!
Matthias Mann,
25-01-2017 17:28
Re : Cholorociboria aeruginosa ?
Chlorociboria aeruginascens
Spore: Beug et al. (2014): 5-7 (-10) x 1-2,5 µm; Medardi (2012): 10 x 2 µm; Ellis & Ellis (1985): 6-8 x 1-1,5 µm; Chlorosplenium aeruginascens: Br. & Kr. (1984): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm; Jordan (2004): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm; Thompson (2013): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm; Dennis (1981): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm;
Francisco, I am confused about the dimensions of your measurements.
Greetings!
Matthias
Spore: Beug et al. (2014): 5-7 (-10) x 1-2,5 µm; Medardi (2012): 10 x 2 µm; Ellis & Ellis (1985): 6-8 x 1-1,5 µm; Chlorosplenium aeruginascens: Br. & Kr. (1984): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm; Jordan (2004): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm; Thompson (2013): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm; Dennis (1981): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm;
Francisco, I am confused about the dimensions of your measurements.
Greetings!
Matthias
Hans-Otto Baral,
25-01-2017 17:42
Re : Cholorociboria aeruginosa ?
Hi Matthias
C. aeruginosa has indeed such large measurements, according to my personal data.
Also in Dixon 1975 it is 8-15 x 2-4
and in Svrcek 1962 12-16 x 2.5-3.5
Don't confuse this with C. aeruginascens.
Zotto
C. aeruginosa has indeed such large measurements, according to my personal data.
Also in Dixon 1975 it is 8-15 x 2-4
and in Svrcek 1962 12-16 x 2.5-3.5
Don't confuse this with C. aeruginascens.
Zotto
Matthias Mann,
25-01-2017 18:41
Re : Cholorociboria aeruginosa ?
I mixed it up, indeed.

Chlorocibora.0.1-0001.JPG