04-11-2025 09:07
Hello.A suspected Hymenoscyphus sprouting on a thi
04-11-2025 12:43
Edvin Johannesen
Hi! One more found on old Populus tremula log in O
03-11-2025 21:34
Edvin Johannesen
These tiny (0.4-0.5 mm diam.), whitish, short-stip
28-10-2025 15:37
Carl FarmerI'd be grateful for any suggestions for this strik
03-11-2025 16:30
Hans-Otto Baral
Hello I want to ask you if you have found this ye
28-10-2025 19:33
Nicolas Suberbielle
Bonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre avis sur cette r
Cholorociboria aeruginosa ?
Francisco SÁNCHEZ,
25-01-2017 13:15
Esporas de:
(11.6) 12.5 - 15.9 (17.5) × (2) 2.8 - 3.6 (3.9) µm
Q = (3.3) 3.9 - 5.3 (7.3) ; N = 50
Me = 14.4 × 3.2 µm ; Qe = 4.6
Hans-Otto Baral,
25-01-2017 15:09
Re : Cholorociboria aeruginosa ?
Yes, it is very clearly C. aeruginosa!
Matthias Mann,
25-01-2017 17:28
Re : Cholorociboria aeruginosa ?
Chlorociboria aeruginascens
Spore: Beug et al. (2014): 5-7 (-10) x 1-2,5 µm; Medardi (2012): 10 x 2 µm; Ellis & Ellis (1985): 6-8 x 1-1,5 µm; Chlorosplenium aeruginascens: Br. & Kr. (1984): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm; Jordan (2004): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm; Thompson (2013): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm; Dennis (1981): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm;
Francisco, I am confused about the dimensions of your measurements.
Greetings!
Matthias
Spore: Beug et al. (2014): 5-7 (-10) x 1-2,5 µm; Medardi (2012): 10 x 2 µm; Ellis & Ellis (1985): 6-8 x 1-1,5 µm; Chlorosplenium aeruginascens: Br. & Kr. (1984): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm; Jordan (2004): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm; Thompson (2013): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm; Dennis (1981): 6-10 x 1,5-2 µm;
Francisco, I am confused about the dimensions of your measurements.
Greetings!
Matthias
Hans-Otto Baral,
25-01-2017 17:42
Re : Cholorociboria aeruginosa ?
Hi Matthias
C. aeruginosa has indeed such large measurements, according to my personal data.
Also in Dixon 1975 it is 8-15 x 2-4
and in Svrcek 1962 12-16 x 2.5-3.5
Don't confuse this with C. aeruginascens.
Zotto
C. aeruginosa has indeed such large measurements, according to my personal data.
Also in Dixon 1975 it is 8-15 x 2-4
and in Svrcek 1962 12-16 x 2.5-3.5
Don't confuse this with C. aeruginascens.
Zotto
Matthias Mann,
25-01-2017 18:41
Re : Cholorociboria aeruginosa ?
I mixed it up, indeed.

Chlorocibora.0.1-0001.JPG