24-03-2026 15:44
Åge OterhalsI hope someone can confirm the name of this collec
25-03-2026 15:06
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me confirm
25-03-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a dead b
25-03-2026 13:54
Enrique Rubio
Does anyone know where I could download Paoletti's
25-03-2026 15:46
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Je sollicite de l'aide pour cette récol
24-03-2026 19:59
William Slosse
Hello everyone,On 23/03/26, I found the following
21-03-2026 15:13
Lepista ZacariasHello everyone, Does any one know of any literatu
24-03-2026 21:37
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur bois (tronc) très pourri de conifère
24-03-2026 21:07
Ethan CrensonHello all, A friend collected this asco in a wood
23-03-2026 20:16
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o
This was growing on Rabbit dung. Hyaline to white 0.3 - 0.45 across. The spores were on average 13 x 8 with a large guttule in one end (in Meltzers). The asci were 55-80 long. The paraphyses slightly swollen at the ends.This keyed out to Coprotus disculus.
Is this a possiblity?
Thanks
Mal
IL is sometimes difficult to separate certain species of Coprotus. C.disculus generally has more cylindrical asci, but it can also have more clavé asci and spores biseriate as part of your photo. It often takes several copies observe to get a better idea. If you happen to watch the top paraphyses you may be also notice if they are slightly uncinate.
Michel.
in my opinion is this Coprotus leucopocillum. How Michel says are the asci from C. disculus more cylindrical and the spores uniseriat, the paraphyses more uncinat. The microfotos are rather old.
Greetings Peter.
Thanks for your thoughts. With a bit more study I have found some more cylindrical asci but most are much more clavate. The more mature asci are also longer with 95µ being the norm.
Some of the paraphyses are straight and some slightly bent but I don't think I would call them uncinate.
The spores are still slightly small for C leucopocillum at 13.5-13.7 but I think that is the most likely identification.
Mal
Ps the final photo should the length of the ascus be measured to the septa where the base starts or to include the base?
Michel.
Thanks Michel.
Mal