19-04-2026 21:23
Steve ClementsBonjour, I found this anamorphic fungus on old pl
19-04-2026 20:46
Steve Clements1 mm diameter approx spherical conidiophores on pl
12-04-2026 17:56
Hardware Tony
Found on dead stems in February earlier this year
17-04-2026 19:16
Enrique Rubio
Hi to everybodyI would appreciate any assistance r
14-04-2026 05:32
Ethan CrensonHi all, A few weeks back a friend pointed out som
17-04-2026 15:14
Bruno Coué
Bonjour.Récoltes du 16/04/2026, sur feuilles mort
12-04-2026 15:52
Gernot FriebesHi,I'm looking for help with this anamorph collect
14-04-2026 21:52
Gernot FriebesHi,found on dead leaves of Carex elata. Conidia: 4
16-04-2026 22:09
Buckwheat PeteHello, I'd like to ask about this older specimen:
15-04-2026 19:33
Fátima Durán ManzanequeHi!! I need help, I found this Ascomycete but I d
Incrucipulum query
Chris Yeates,
22-08-2014 14:11
Bonjour tousI recently had the opportunity to collect on Myrica gale and as I hoped I was able to find Incrucipulum sulphurellum in order to create a 'portrait' of it (see PDF, I shall submit it to the database in due course).
This is clearly the same as Lachnum cruciferum as depicted in Dennis 1949 (as Dasyscypha crucifera). I assume that the epithet 'sulphurellum' predates 'cruciferum' (although it must be by a factor of only a few months?). I am surprised that both taxa are still included separately in Species Fungorum and Mycobank - am I missing something? Unfortunately I do not have access to Baral & Krieglsteiner, Beih. Z. Mykol. 6: 72 (1985)
amitiés
Chris
Incsul0a-0001.pdf
Martin Bemmann,
22-08-2014 14:21
Re : Incrucipulum query
Hi Chris,
they did this synonymy (attached). I don't know why it wasn't adopted by SF or MB..
Cheers
Martin
they did this synonymy (attached). I don't know why it wasn't adopted by SF or MB..
Cheers
Martin
Martin Bemmann,
22-08-2014 15:16
Re : Incrucipulum query
Phillips' publication is dated 28. September 1878. Stafleu gives for Peck's Report no. 30 also September 1878..... ;-)
(both attached)
Peck signed and submitted his report on January 6, 1877.
(both attached)
Peck signed and submitted his report on January 6, 1877.
Martin Bemmann,
22-08-2014 21:42
Re : Incrucipulum query
Me again...
there is a chance to learn a more precise date for Peck's publication in the reprint of his works provided by Vogelenzang (see attachment). I don't have access to this.
Regards
Martin
PS: Sutton's review is from the Transactions Br. Myc. Soc. 75(3) 1980: 520
there is a chance to learn a more precise date for Peck's publication in the reprint of his works provided by Vogelenzang (see attachment). I don't have access to this.
Regards
Martin
PS: Sutton's review is from the Transactions Br. Myc. Soc. 75(3) 1980: 520
Chris Yeates,
22-08-2014 22:42
Re : Incrucipulum query
Thanks for all that work Martin! I love a good detective story . . . . ;-)
LG
Chris
LG
Chris
Martin Bemmann,
22-08-2014 22:53
Re : Incrucipulum query
Dear Chris,
being investigative is my passion as an archaeologist... (detectives for the past) ;-)
I don't have Luijt 1973 either, quoted by Zotto and Krieglsteiner for the synonymy.
Best regards
Martin
being investigative is my passion as an archaeologist... (detectives for the past) ;-)
I don't have Luijt 1973 either, quoted by Zotto and Krieglsteiner for the synonymy.
Best regards
Martin