
03-09-2025 21:59
Philippe PELLICIERLa Léchère, Col de la Madeleine, alt 1970m, au s

07-09-2025 11:34

Hello,I have identified this fungus as Hymenoscyph

02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903

05-09-2025 09:32

Bonjour, hi everyone,Do you know where the fungari

05-09-2025 18:53

Hi! Spores 1 septate; 12-13 x 3um Hairs 35-75

04-09-2025 20:11
Åge OterhalsSaccobolus on dear droppings. Can any of you confi

03-09-2025 12:44
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o
Lamprospora
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
24-08-2010 16:54

Do I miss something? Or what else is the solution? (Unfortunately I have taken no macrofoto).
Regards, Lothar
Raúl Tena Lahoz,
24-08-2010 21:03

Re:Lamprospora
Hi Lothar
Do you have a better microphoto showing the reticulate pattern?
Maybe it was as the one of my photos?
My species is Moravecia (Lamprospora) hvaleri. I find it next to cf Pleuridium acuminatum.
Associated to Tortella tortuosa (host moss) grows Lamprospora cailletii, but spores are bigger (14-15 without ornam. and 15-17 ornam. included) and the lipid body of the spore is 10-13 µm (Benkert´s data in his original description).
Cheers,
Raúl.
Do you have a better microphoto showing the reticulate pattern?
Maybe it was as the one of my photos?
My species is Moravecia (Lamprospora) hvaleri. I find it next to cf Pleuridium acuminatum.
Associated to Tortella tortuosa (host moss) grows Lamprospora cailletii, but spores are bigger (14-15 without ornam. and 15-17 ornam. included) and the lipid body of the spore is 10-13 µm (Benkert´s data in his original description).
Cheers,
Raúl.
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
24-08-2010 21:17

Re:Lamprospora
Dear Raul,
thank your very much for your posting. I have to have a closer look at the specimen. Can you tell me where Moravecia (Lamprospora) hvaleri is described, and who is the author, and what the spore dimensions are.
I cannot exclude Pleuridium acuminatum growing there (I know the moss, when it is fruiting).
Yours,
Lothar
thank your very much for your posting. I have to have a closer look at the specimen. Can you tell me where Moravecia (Lamprospora) hvaleri is described, and who is the author, and what the spore dimensions are.
I cannot exclude Pleuridium acuminatum growing there (I know the moss, when it is fruiting).
Yours,
Lothar
Raúl Tena Lahoz,
24-08-2010 21:59

Re:Lamprospora
Hi again Lothar,
The authorities are Dieter Benkert and Roy Kristiansen.
Moravecia hvaleri is described in Z. Mycol. 65 1999, p. 33-35: "Moravecia hvaleri und Kotlabaea trondii- zwei neue Pezizales-Arten aus Norwegen". Spore dimensions are 12-14 x 11-13 without ornamentation. I have found spores bigger (up to 15,5) but, as in all Octospora-Lamprospora, the variation from inmature to mature can be very high.
Recently, in 2007, Perry, Hansen & Pfister have found that Moravecia hvaleri is nested to the Lamprospora clade lineage in "A phylogenetic overview of the family Pyronemataceae (Ascomycota, Pezizales)".
Cheers,
Raúl.
The authorities are Dieter Benkert and Roy Kristiansen.
Moravecia hvaleri is described in Z. Mycol. 65 1999, p. 33-35: "Moravecia hvaleri und Kotlabaea trondii- zwei neue Pezizales-Arten aus Norwegen". Spore dimensions are 12-14 x 11-13 without ornamentation. I have found spores bigger (up to 15,5) but, as in all Octospora-Lamprospora, the variation from inmature to mature can be very high.
Recently, in 2007, Perry, Hansen & Pfister have found that Moravecia hvaleri is nested to the Lamprospora clade lineage in "A phylogenetic overview of the family Pyronemataceae (Ascomycota, Pezizales)".
Cheers,
Raúl.
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
24-08-2010 22:19

Re:Lamprospora
Dear Raul,
thank you very much for the information. I am sure now that my collection cannot be Moravecia hvaleri, for the following reasons: My collection has
- clear and large oil drops in the spores
- spores perfectly globose (not broadly ellipsoid) and even smaller as given for M. hvaleri
- the ornamentation does not fit pefectly
- I did not notice Pleuridium
Especially the first reason is severe I think.
Anyway, M. hvaleri seems to be the taxon coming closest to my fungus by now.
Thanks a lot for your help!
Lothar
thank you very much for the information. I am sure now that my collection cannot be Moravecia hvaleri, for the following reasons: My collection has
- clear and large oil drops in the spores
- spores perfectly globose (not broadly ellipsoid) and even smaller as given for M. hvaleri
- the ornamentation does not fit pefectly
- I did not notice Pleuridium
Especially the first reason is severe I think.
Anyway, M. hvaleri seems to be the taxon coming closest to my fungus by now.
Thanks a lot for your help!
Lothar