27-11-2025 11:46
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918
17-09-2025 10:50
Heather MerryleesHi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif
29-11-2025 08:40
Andreas Millinger
Hello,on a splintered part of a branch on the grou
28-11-2025 16:45
Nogueira HéctorNovember 23, 2025 Requejo de Sanabria (León) SPAI
25-11-2025 14:24
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522
27-11-2025 15:41
Thomas LæssøeSpores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;
27-11-2025 12:01
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727
27-11-2025 11:31
Thomas LæssøeCollectors notes: Immersed ascomata, erumpent thro
23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623
26-11-2025 18:13
The entire run of Mycotaxon is now available throu
Can it be?
Marja Pennanen,
31-07-2010 00:09
I've checked many and am nearly always uncertain of the species.
But now this was suprisingly easy:
Marja Pennanen,
31-07-2010 00:17
Re:Can it be?
These were even 0,5 mm wide and grow on Potentilla palustris.
Spores were about 7-11x1-1,5, asci (20-) 25-35x4-5, IKI+ and paraphyses narrow (1,5-2 micrometers wide).
The hairs were about 17-21x2,5-3 and had something on the tips (photo).
I ended to Hyaloscypha secalina var paludicola.
Second opinions?
Marja
Spores were about 7-11x1-1,5, asci (20-) 25-35x4-5, IKI+ and paraphyses narrow (1,5-2 micrometers wide).
The hairs were about 17-21x2,5-3 and had something on the tips (photo).
I ended to Hyaloscypha secalina var paludicola.
Second opinions?
Marja
Stip Helleman,
31-07-2010 21:37
Re:Can it be?
Hi Marja,
Judging your description secalina var paludosa fits well, unfortunately the photo is not giving more information.
cheers Stip
Judging your description secalina var paludosa fits well, unfortunately the photo is not giving more information.
cheers Stip


