Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

14-04-2009 22:10

NC NC

hello forum, i am in search of informations, wh

14-04-2009 16:25

Gernot Friebes

Hello, who can help me with this pyrenomycet? I

12-04-2009 11:11

Jean Pierre Dechaume Jean Pierre Dechaume

Bonjour à tous, Si je peux me permettre, je soll

11-04-2009 08:24

Gernot Friebes

Hello, a few days ago I found this Ascomycet on

11-04-2009 08:23

NC NC

Hello, a few days ago I found this Ascomycet on

09-04-2009 11:52

Michel RIMBAUD

Bonjour, amis forum. Je cherche vainement à iden

09-04-2009 01:54

Stip Helleman Stip Helleman

Bonjour à tout This is the first record for the

08-04-2009 22:05

VASILEIOS KAOUNAS

Found hypogeous under of Helianthemum sp.

08-04-2009 20:46

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Purrait quelqu'un me donner une opinion sur cet pe

08-04-2009 18:25

Gernot Friebes

Hello, I found some Ascomycetes which I am not

« < 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 > »
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC, 14-04-2009 22:10
hello forum,

i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...

best

dirk