Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

04-07-2013 14:02

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Dear friends Under a melanized, epidermial blacki

04-07-2013 14:28

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody Can anyone help me with this spec

04-07-2013 06:10

Nina Filippova

(10.06.2013)Surprisingly, litter of Eriophorum rus

02-07-2013 01:09

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

Moving on from the possible S legaliae there was t

02-07-2013 22:38

Jean-Paul Priou Jean-Paul Priou

Bonsoir à tous,Avez-vous une idée sur ce Mollisi

01-07-2013 22:38

Ralph Vandiest Ralph Vandiest

Hello, I found the following species on genista/cy

03-07-2013 20:21

Ueli Graf Ueli Graf

Hallo,diesen Asco habe icham 20. 06. auf dem Furka

03-07-2013 08:56

Nina Filippova

Leaves of Andromeda polifolia inhabited by not ver

03-07-2013 14:20

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi againI'd like to know your opinion about this U

03-07-2013 15:14

Björn Wergen Björn Wergen

Hi there, does anyone have these articles as PDF?K

« < 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 > »
Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 14:02
Enrique RubioDear friends
 
Under a melanized, epidermial blackish tissue with inconspicuous perithecial mounds, we have collected these inmersed, isolated. not really stromatic perithecia up to 0.2 mm in diameter under a clypeate structure.
The long cylindrical 8-spored asci have an appical apparatus IKI bb and the brownish (at maturity) ascospores have a germ-slit full spore lenght and they have not visible appendages.


The fungus was on still attached branches of Berberis vulgaris at 1700 m of altitude.

With the classic keys I arrive to the genus Anthostomella. What do you think?    

Thanks again 

  • message #24258
  • message #24258
  • message #24258
  • message #24258
  • message #24258
Jacques Fournier, 04-07-2013 14:26
Jacques Fournier
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Hola Enrique,
possibly Anthostomella but not a common species at first view. I checked Lu & Hyde's monograph to no avail. Could you be more specific about the clypei, are they separate or do they form a superficial pseudostroma by coalescing? Are the asci short or long pedicellate? Do ascospores have a mucilaginous sheath? something to test in India ink, just add a small drop to the edge of a water mount, it's better than to observe directly in India ink, otherwise dilute it.
Buena suerte!
Jacques
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 17:49
Enrique Rubio
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Hi Jacques


There are a superficial, thin and continuous blackish pseudostroma over the isolated perithecia, but at this level it seems to be thicker.
I have seen any mucilaginous sheath or appendages in china ink or nigrosine. The asci are shortly stipitate (i.e 55 microns long for the pars sporifera vs 35 for the stipes)
  • message #24269
Jacques Fournier, 04-07-2013 18:20
Jacques Fournier
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
thanks for the information, after checking the key in the monograph I failed to find a match. Anyway the continuous pseudostroma is not typical of Anthostomella. It rather recalls the fungi placed in Lopadostoma subgenus Anthostomopsis Rappaz (1995), as do the ellipsoid-equilateral ascospores. There are only three species in that subgenus, one L. flavoviride has ascospores that might fit but the peudostroma is said to be green black. Is that the case?
Tell me if you don't have Rappaz paper.
Cheers,
Jacques
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 18:51
Enrique Rubio
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Hi Jacques

Yes. I have Rappaz's papier. Maybe you are right because some little areas of the pseudostroma have faintly yellowish/greenish hues but only at the surface.
  • message #24272
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 18:54
Enrique Rubio
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Can you see them in the image?
Jacques Fournier, 04-07-2013 19:06
Jacques Fournier
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
hum, not striking! I would not advise you to use this name, maybe someone will have a better idea.
Cheers,
Jacques
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 19:22
Enrique Rubio
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Of course! They are not so conspicuous! 

Thanks, Jacques