20-05-2026 21:49
Margot en Geert VullingsWe found this Lachnum on Juncus stems mown last ye
21-05-2026 17:01
Pierre RepellinBonjour à toutes et à tous,Je recherche l'articl
20-05-2026 20:08
Andreas Millinger
Good evening,another quite distinctive find from M
20-05-2026 12:57
Ingo Ibelshäuser
Hello everybody, on decayed hardwood e.g. Quercus
20-05-2026 17:47
Margot en Geert VullingsWe found this Mollisia on dead Juncus stems mown l
22-04-2026 20:54
Enrique Rubio
Hi to everybody.This Pyrenopeziza grew in moist le
19-05-2026 12:55
Hardware Tony
After checking Gminder and Otto's library I cannot
octospora coccinea ?
carl van den broeck,
21-01-2024 21:37
Dear guestsOn a wall in Veurne (B) we find a lot of Octospora on Bryum capilara. With multiple keys the result is O coccinea, but I am not satisfied because the spores I find are wider than in the description on octospora.de and FMBDS (Van Vooren). Where is my mistake?
28.4 [29.6 ; 30.3] 31.5 × 10.7 [11.1 ; 11.4] 11.8 µm
Q = 2.5 [2.6 ; 2.7] 2.8 ; N = 17 ; C = 68%
Me = 29.9 × 11.3 µm ; Qe = 2.7
excipulum ectal = angularis
Lukas Janosik,
22-01-2024 11:27
Re : octospora coccinea ?
Dear Carl,
your collection represents an undescribed species that is relatively frequently recorded on Bryum capillare across Europe, see e.g. here https://bryophilous.co.uk/octospora-sp-bryum-capillare/, based on DNA it falls in the Octospora coccinea agg. but the spores are indeed different.
Lukas
your collection represents an undescribed species that is relatively frequently recorded on Bryum capillare across Europe, see e.g. here https://bryophilous.co.uk/octospora-sp-bryum-capillare/, based on DNA it falls in the Octospora coccinea agg. but the spores are indeed different.
Lukas