24-12-2007 17:04
Hermosilla Carlos EnriqueSalut, je suis ces jours en vacances de navidad et
24-12-2007 14:43
Alain GARDIENNET
Bonjour à tous, J'aimerais une confirmation pou
17-12-2007 05:28
ANGELOS PAPADIMITRIOUDoes anyone know what this is? Thanks for any h
15-12-2007 20:36
Hans-Otto Baral
Hi Does anybody know what is the current name, En
Diaporthales of dung
Peter Welt,
03-04-2009 16:49
How a fungus that? We think Gnomoniella, but it fits no species. The spores have the dimensions of 18,5-23 x 3-4 µm. Gnomoniella euphorbiae - verrucosae Monod has similar spores, but are much wider (20-22,5 x 5,3-6 µm). Also fit the data on the habitat is not (Euphorbia verrucosa). This plant is not for us. I have this fungus on dung of roe deer found. Peter Welt
Peter Welt,
03-04-2009 16:53
Diaporthales of dung 2
Another picture
Peter Welt,
03-04-2009 16:55
Diaporthales of dung 3
spores in L4 T
Peter Welt,
03-04-2009 16:56
Diaporthales of dung 4
spores in L4T
Peter Welt,
03-04-2009 16:57
Diaporthales of dung 5
spores in Lugol
Peter Welt,
03-04-2009 16:58
Diaporthales of dung 6
Neck
David Malloch,
04-04-2009 16:50
Re:Diaporthales of dung
Hello Peter,
How about the Lasiosphaeriaceae? These are common on dung. Sabine Huhndorf's web page at
http://www.fieldmuseum.org/research_Collections/botany/botany_sites/ascomycete/peetwebpages/peettitle.htm
discusses a number of genera that might be worth considering.
Dave
How about the Lasiosphaeriaceae? These are common on dung. Sabine Huhndorf's web page at
http://www.fieldmuseum.org/research_Collections/botany/botany_sites/ascomycete/peetwebpages/peettitle.htm
discusses a number of genera that might be worth considering.
Dave
Peter Welt,
04-04-2009 19:27
Re:Diaporthales of dung
Thanks Dave for your reply.
I know many genres to dung because I along with Norbert Heine coprophilous fungi edit and publish. Also your work along with Cain, I know.
But I think that the form of the fungus (long neck) and the construction of the asci (apical ring) for more Diaporthales speaks. I already had a suspect in the genus, Conioscyphascus (Studies in Mycology 50:95-108), but there are paraphyses there, which I found in my could not be ascertained. In addition, the spores are septate.
At what a genus because they have thought it?
Peter
I know many genres to dung because I along with Norbert Heine coprophilous fungi edit and publish. Also your work along with Cain, I know.
But I think that the form of the fungus (long neck) and the construction of the asci (apical ring) for more Diaporthales speaks. I already had a suspect in the genus, Conioscyphascus (Studies in Mycology 50:95-108), but there are paraphyses there, which I found in my could not be ascertained. In addition, the spores are septate.
At what a genus because they have thought it?
Peter