08-04-2021 18:28
Mirek GrycHiSmall mushrooms but a big problem :)This is the
07-04-2021 15:46
Christopher Engelhardt
Hello. Under Crateagus I found this cup today, 10
08-04-2021 15:16
Mirek GrycHello everyone.I have a problem with determining t
05-02-2018 21:19
Blasco Rafael
Hola a ver si me pueden ayudar con esta muestra ,
05-04-2021 23:33
Valencia Lopez Francisco JavierHola amigosTengo estas supuestas Rutstroemia sp???
05-04-2021 22:27
Chris Yeates
Bonsoir tous Using Gernot's excellent key to the
04-04-2021 19:35
Chris Yeates
I collected this fungus recently on a partially co
Nitschkia on Prunus Padus.
Mirek Gryc,
08-04-2021 18:28
Small mushrooms but a big problem :)
This is the first species Nitschkia that I researched, so I lack experience.
A rich collection in ascomata so I devoted a large group to find a hair and subiculum. Despite many attempts, unfortunately, I have not found these elements.
Dimensions of spores are the most similar to Nitschkia modesta?
Nitschkia grevillei has a narrower spores.
Nitschkia pezizoidea has the most suitable spore sizes but ascomata not tuberculate.
Spores 1-septate (poorly visible):
(7.1) 7.5 - 9.7 (9.8) × (2.4) 2.5 - 2.9 (3.2) ?m
Q = (2.6) 2.7 - 3.5 (3.6); N = 15
Me = 8.5 × 2.7 ?m; QE = 3.1
9.73 2.80
9.19 2.54
8.83 2.89
8.53 2.91
9.77 2.68
7.29 2.73
7.68 2.81
8.14 2.75
7.47 2.89
9.49 3.21
8.08 2.52
8.30 2.37
9.68 2.84
9.02 2.87
7.06 2.35
greetings
Mirek
Enrique Rubio,
08-04-2021 18:48
Re : Nitschkia on Prunus Padus.
Hi Mirek
I propose you Tympanopsis confertula (= Nitschkia confertula).
I propose you Tympanopsis confertula (= Nitschkia confertula).
Mirek Gryc,
08-04-2021 19:39
Re : Nitschkia on Prunus Padus.
Hi Enrique.
Actually, morphological features and some microscopic very similar but also too much discrepancies to recognize my collection for this species.
First of all, spores should be much wider.
Substrate also inadequate, I have not seen another fungus exchanged as a host.
Unfortunately, I have to check all the features more accurately.
Thank you
Mirek
Actually, morphological features and some microscopic very similar but also too much discrepancies to recognize my collection for this species.
First of all, spores should be much wider.
Substrate also inadequate, I have not seen another fungus exchanged as a host.
Unfortunately, I have to check all the features more accurately.
Thank you
Mirek