![](/images/lu.png)
16-11-2010 23:32
![Björn Wergen](/uploads/user_vgn/Wergen-0001.jpg)
Hello, I have some problems with these two find
![](/images/lu.png)
16-11-2010 19:46
![Pérez del Amo Carlos Manuel](/uploads/user_vgn/Carlos-Manuel--0001.jpg)
Hola amigos. Se trata de mi primera intervención
![](/images/lu.png)
15-11-2010 13:44
Guy GarciaChers tous, Voici une photo d'une ancienne récol
![](/images/lu.png)
14-11-2010 22:35
Javier OrmadBonjour à tous, je présente une sorte de feuille
![](/images/lu.png)
14-11-2010 01:00
![Yannick Mourgues](/uploads/user_vgn/Mourgues-0001.jpg)
This asco found today on herbaceous stem. Excip
![](/images/lu.png)
12-11-2010 20:29
![Beñat Jeannerot](/uploads/user_vgn/Jeannerot-0001.jpg)
Bonjour à tous, Je trouve plusieurs exemplaire
![](/images/lu.png)
12-11-2010 12:26
Bonjour, Sur l'écorce d'un tronc de Quercus viva
Leucoscypha semi-immersa
Björn Wergen,
16-11-2010 23:32
![Björn Wergen](/uploads/user_vgn/Wergen-0001.jpg)
I have some problems with these two findings:
The first one is, hopefully my determination is correct, Leucoscypha semi-immersa (micro see photo). Fb size about 2-6 mm, orange-brown.
The second species is perhaps not L. semi-immersa, even if it looks like this in the microscopic features. But have a look on the macrophoto, it shows a completely different ascomata being bigger in size (4-12 mm) and having another color.
Are the showed species two different one or just an example of L. semi-immera variability?
Thanks a lot,
cheers, Kazuya
Michel Hairaud,
16-11-2010 23:41
![Michel Hairaud](/uploads/user_vgn/Hairaud-0001.jpg)
Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
Hi Kazama,
Are the apos lying on burnt ground ?
I would suggest then Leucoscypha patavina which is also fairly common on sandy soil on the coas.
Amitiés
Michel
Are the apos lying on burnt ground ?
I would suggest then Leucoscypha patavina which is also fairly common on sandy soil on the coas.
Amitiés
Michel
Björn Wergen,
17-11-2010 00:19
![Björn Wergen](/uploads/user_vgn/Wergen-0001.jpg)
Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
Hi Michel,
I have also thought about L. patavina, it was even my first thought after I had found this species. I am not sure now, I will proof it tomorrow, but the key did not take me to L. patavina, but to L. semi-immersa, which was already found and determined. This one is NOT L. semi-immersa, I think.
I cannot tell you if it is burnt ground. If yes, it was not obvious, but I am sure the location had something special, perhaps also with some burnt ground.
cheers and thanks,
Kazuya
I have also thought about L. patavina, it was even my first thought after I had found this species. I am not sure now, I will proof it tomorrow, but the key did not take me to L. patavina, but to L. semi-immersa, which was already found and determined. This one is NOT L. semi-immersa, I think.
I cannot tell you if it is burnt ground. If yes, it was not obvious, but I am sure the location had something special, perhaps also with some burnt ground.
cheers and thanks,
Kazuya