16-02-2026 21:25
Andreas Millinger
Good evening,failed to find an idea for this fungu
08-12-2025 17:37
Lothar Krieglsteiner
20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened
17-02-2026 17:26
Nicolas Suberbielle
Bonjour à tous, Je recherche cette publication :
15-02-2026 04:32
Tomaz Vucko
One more specimen that is giving me some descent a
17-02-2026 13:41
Isabelle CharissouBonjour, est-ce que quelqu'un pourrait me fournir
16-02-2026 18:34
Thierry Blondelle
Bonjour,La micro de cet anamorphe de Hercospora su
16-02-2026 17:14
Joanne TaylorLast week we published the following paper where w
16-02-2026 16:53
Isabelle CharissouBonjour, quelqu'un pourrait-il me transmettre un
Tapesia
Chris Yeates,
05-02-2022 19:11
Bonsoir
Am I correct in thinking that while Tapesia is no longer considered to be a justifiable genus v. Mollisia, there are a number of combinations which have not yet been made? I am assuming that older combinations in Mollisia can be treated as the valid current name - e.g. M. evilescens (P. Karst.) Mussat, and M. fusca (Pers.) P. Karst. ?
Also I am assuming that a new specific name would be needed for Tapesia cinerella Rehm, which seems not to be conspecific with Mollisia cinerella Sacc.
Clarification welcomed!
Amitiés, Chris
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
07-02-2022 08:57
Re : Tapesia
Hi Chris.
Tapesia is a rejected name, against Mollisia, as indicated in the Appendix III of Shenzhen Code.
As a consequence, all validly published names in Tapesia should be combined in Mollisia, except if such combination already exists.
As Tapesia cinerella Rehm does not share the same type of Mollisia cinerella Sacc., a new name is required to combine it in Mollisia.
Tapesia is a rejected name, against Mollisia, as indicated in the Appendix III of Shenzhen Code.
As a consequence, all validly published names in Tapesia should be combined in Mollisia, except if such combination already exists.
As Tapesia cinerella Rehm does not share the same type of Mollisia cinerella Sacc., a new name is required to combine it in Mollisia.
Chris Yeates,
07-02-2022 16:54
Re : Tapesia
Un grand merci Nicolas
C'est exactement comme ça que j'ai interprété la situation.
Amitiés,Chris
Hans-Otto Baral,
07-02-2022 22:37
Re : Tapesia
Yes, some new combinations would be necessary. The only thing is whether the species in question is a good one or perhaps only a synonym of another. Many such synonymies are still to be discovered, and Mollisia with its high species diversity is a good example, either between teleomorphs or between teleomorphs and an anamorph that might have priority.