26-04-2013 11:04
Joop van der Lee
Found on cow dung.Asci: 166.12-172.52x25.48-28.11
26-04-2013 21:07
Esquivel-Rios EduardoHi All.This ascomycete unknown was found in Coccol
23-04-2013 11:16
Gilles Corriol
Bonjour,Voici une récolte de Cheilymenia (GC13040
25-04-2013 15:07
Chris Yeates
Bonjour touswhile studying Stomiopeltis betulae on
24-04-2013 23:37
Peter ThompsonHello Everyone,I have a collection of black, spher
22-04-2013 16:48
Enrique Rubio
Hi to allCould this fungus be Leucostoma persoonii
Podospora anserina/pauciseta
Joop van der Lee,
26-04-2013 11:04
Found on cow dung.Asci: 166.12-172.52x25.48-28.11 um
Spores: 34-07-40.97x18.43-25.88 um
Pedicel: 18.58-19.39x3.94-4.53 um
Upper cauda: 6.47 um wide (photo-5)
Fugaceous secondary appendages attached to pedicel (photo-8)
No phialides observed
No lower cauda observed.
P. Anserina is close to P. Comata but the latter has smaller spores
Michel Delpont,
26-04-2013 16:55
Re : Podospora Anserina?
Hello Joop.
The lower caudal is often ephemeral, it is well Podospora anserina.
Michel.
The lower caudal is often ephemeral, it is well Podospora anserina.
Michel.
Joop van der Lee,
26-04-2013 21:06
Re : Podospora Anserina?
Merci beaucooup Michel
Norbert Heine,
26-04-2013 22:47
Re : Podospora Anserina?
Hello Joop and Michel,
the species seems to be clear, but what about the name?
I prefer the name Podospora pauciseta (Ces.) Traverso, because the epithet pauciseta is older than anserina.
Look also at IF, Mycobank.org and Lundqvist!
Don't know, why Francesco Doveri favours anserina?
Norbert
the species seems to be clear, but what about the name?
I prefer the name Podospora pauciseta (Ces.) Traverso, because the epithet pauciseta is older than anserina.
Look also at IF, Mycobank.org and Lundqvist!
Don't know, why Francesco Doveri favours anserina?
Norbert
Joop van der Lee,
27-04-2013 00:45
Re : Podospora Anserina?
I will change the name Norbert.
But on the other hand in The Canadian Journal of Botany from 1969 there is an article from J.H Mirza and R.F Cain called Revisions of the genus Podospora that handles P. Anserina and does not mention the name you provided.
But on the other hand in The Canadian Journal of Botany from 1969 there is an article from J.H Mirza and R.F Cain called Revisions of the genus Podospora that handles P. Anserina and does not mention the name you provided.