30-05-2026 21:12
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,
31-05-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a rather
25-05-2026 16:35
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,
29-05-2026 15:35
daniel FERREBonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre aide pour cette
28-05-2026 16:15
James MitchellHello,Does anyone have the original publication of
28-05-2026 11:06
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10596750
23-05-2026 11:44
Charles Grapinet
Hello, I am having trouble identifying this copro
25-05-2026 16:44
François BartholomeeusenHi forum members,During an excursion organised by
26-05-2026 21:25
Dirk GerstnerHello everyone, I'm completely stumped by this li
Cyathicula on Filipendula
Juuso Äikäs,
10-06-2022 17:21
I was assuming this is the normal C. cyathoidea, but this is quite clearly lacking croziers. The spores are also maybe a bit on the small side (5.9 - 9.4 × 1.6 - 2.1 µm).
Is there a version of that species without croziers, or is this something else?
Hans-Otto Baral,
10-06-2022 17:33
Re : Cyathicula on Filipendula
I fear nobody can tell. Cyathicula cyathoidea is a vast aggregate and little explored by DNA in combination with exact morphology. Not sure if there exists an epitype. In Pelaez et al. (2011) we published a phylogeny about Cyathicula, with at least 5 different groups of cyathodea-like samples (includin cacaliae and pallida). Some were withou croziers, the majority with.
Juuso Äikäs,
10-06-2022 20:52
Re : Cyathicula on Filipendula
Ok, I see, thanks. Maybe I'll just leave it cf. cyathoidea.