15-11-2025 23:22
Mario FilippaHello,this is what I think to be Hymenoscyphus mac
14-11-2025 16:26
Marian Jagers
Hello everyone, On dead wood of Cytisus scoparius
15-11-2025 20:25
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde, Nov. 2025
14-11-2025 18:31
Lothar Krieglsteiner
Hello,can somebody provide me with a file of:Rothe
12-11-2025 09:25
Viktorie Halasu
Hello, I need help with a pale terrestric Pseudom
11-11-2025 20:16
Bohan JiaHi, lastly I have found these tiny yellow decayin
09-11-2025 13:20
Hello.A tiny ascomycete, appearing as erupting gra
Hypoxylon multiforme?
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
19-09-2008 07:22
Spores 10,2-11,6*4,2-5,2 ìm, Q=2,2-2,6
Christian Lechat,
19-09-2008 08:33
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
Difficult to say with so few elements, but it looks like H. cohaerens.
Regards,
Regards,
Jacques Fournier,
19-09-2008 08:48
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
Hi Vasileios,
H. cohaerens is specific for Fagus. Otherwise its main difference with H multiforme is the germ slit length on ascospores: short in multiforme, spore-length in cohaerens, best seen in KOH.
You can visit http://pyrenomycetes.free.fr/ for more informations.
Best wishes,
Jacques
H. cohaerens is specific for Fagus. Otherwise its main difference with H multiforme is the germ slit length on ascospores: short in multiforme, spore-length in cohaerens, best seen in KOH.
You can visit http://pyrenomycetes.free.fr/ for more informations.
Best wishes,
Jacques
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
19-09-2008 08:52
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
Thank you very much for your correspondence
Andrew N. Miller,
19-09-2008 18:08
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
I believe both H. multiforme and H. cohaerens (along with H. truncatum and H. annulatum) have all been transferred to the new genus, Annulohypoxylon by Y.-M. Ju, J.D. Rogers & H.-
M. Hsieh.
Andy
M. Hsieh.
Andy
Jacques Fournier,
19-09-2008 18:48
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
Hi Andy,
you are perfectly right as to the new name Annulohypoxylon but I told Vasileios to visit my website, which has not been updated since this change....names change but fortunately fungi do not much ..
Jacques
you are perfectly right as to the new name Annulohypoxylon but I told Vasileios to visit my website, which has not been updated since this change....names change but fortunately fungi do not much ..
Jacques

