Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

10-10-2011 16:45

Jacques Fournier Jacques Fournier

Bonjour,j'ai été attiré par ce disco qui sur le

04-10-2011 13:16

Yannick Mourgues Yannick Mourgues

Bonjour à tous.Avez-vous connaissances d'autres a

06-10-2011 22:05

Yannick Mourgues Yannick Mourgues

Bonsoir à tous.Première interrogation parmi tout

06-10-2011 22:31

Yannick Mourgues Yannick Mourgues

Re.Ce genre fait-il parti de la famille des Sarcos

06-10-2011 22:10

Yannick Mourgues Yannick Mourgues

Re.Deuxième interrogation du moment : Le genre Di

06-10-2011 10:36

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I am looking for the following article: "Notes

05-10-2011 20:59

Alex Akulov Alex Akulov

Dear FriendsCan you help me to identify one discom

02-10-2011 21:03

Björn Wergen Björn Wergen

Hi,yesterday I have collected a new Pezizales, I t

29-09-2011 18:05

Martin Mullett

 Hello all, I am running a spore trap (Burkhard)

03-10-2011 21:47

Roland Labbé

Bonjour !Par cette photo, j'aimerais juste savoir

« < 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 > »
Crocicreas amenti?
Dmitry Gavryushin, 20-01-2007 13:14
Jan. 14, 2007, on fallen catkins of Salix. Size 0.5 to 1 mm.
  • message #1304
Dmitry Gavryushin, 20-01-2007 13:16
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Another view.
  • message #1305
Dmitry Gavryushin, 20-01-2007 13:17
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
A microscopic sketch.
  • message #1306
Dmitry Gavryushin, 20-01-2007 13:17
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
A sketch of a portion of a section.
  • message #1307
Perz Piotr, 20-01-2007 13:51
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Yeah, C.amenti.
Hans-Otto Baral, 20-01-2007 21:15
Hans-Otto Baral
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
I don´t think so. P. amenti has shorter stalks of apothecia and spores have a different shape, broader, strongly clavate. No idea!
Perz Piotr, 20-01-2007 21:27
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Och yes, Zotto is (like allways) right. My answer was to quickly :(

  • message #1324
Hans-Otto Baral, 20-01-2007 23:41
Hans-Otto Baral
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Your spores, Piotr, are not even so different from Dmitrij´s. To clarify the identity of this nice fungus, it is necessary to see the contents of the living paraphyses. In C. amenti they are filled with strongly refractive guttules (VBs). In other genera like Allophylaria the contents are elongate as in Mollisia. Also we should know the IKI reaction and shape of the apical ring.

Zotto
Perz Piotr, 20-01-2007 23:59
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Tak,

Dmitry, here some Crocicreas amenti help:

living paraphyses:

  • message #1326
Perz Piotr, 20-01-2007 23:59
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Paraphyses in IKI

  • message #1327
Perz Piotr, 20-01-2007 23:59
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
hyphae on external side of apo (ectal excipulum)

  • message #1328
Perz Piotr, 21-01-2007 00:00
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
hyphae on external side os stipe:

  • message #1329
Perz Piotr, 21-01-2007 00:49
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Macro 1

  • message #1330
Perz Piotr, 21-01-2007 00:49
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Macro 2

  • message #1331
Perz Piotr, 21-01-2007 00:50
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Macro 3.

Here can you see, that the apos are NOT smooth. The same "hairlike cells" i see on yours second macro on the margin ?

  • message #1332
Hans-Otto Baral, 21-01-2007 17:12
Hans-Otto Baral
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Thanks for the very good help, Piotr! The stalk is longer than I had in mind. So it could well be amenti, what else...

Zotto
Dmitry Gavryushin, 22-01-2007 09:15
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Thanks a lot Piotr and Zotto - I still have some specimens, so maybe I should take a closer look...
Perz Piotr, 22-01-2007 09:20
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Hi Dmitry,

the guttules are visible only in LIVING cells, so you should collect a new Apos and take a look in vital state.