12-11-2019 10:32
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Hi againExactly at the same place than my previous
25-12-2019 17:54
Valencia Lopez Francisco JavierHola a todos/asEstas supuestas pezizas estaban en
28-07-2011 18:31
Alex Akulov
Dear FriendsToday I made the pdf file of Velenovsk
12-07-2015 00:05
Nedim Jukic
This one from the same locality as the previous on
30-05-2026 21:12
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,
31-05-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a rather
25-05-2026 16:35
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,
29-05-2026 15:35
daniel FERREBonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre aide pour cette
Small Pyreno on bark of Salix
Perz Piotr,
15-05-2007 18:25
I found this small Pyreno on Salix bark. Asci IKI-, all parts KOH-. I don't know asci 8- or 4-spored :(
Spores 4-celled (3-septate).
Hi res platte here: http://www.mikologia.pl/rozne_pliki/20070426-007%20201.jpg
Any idea?
Pimpek
Jacques Fournier,
15-05-2007 18:58
Re:Small Pyreno on bark of Salix
Hi Pimpek,
this could be a number of different things!!
First check if it is not a Chaetosphaeria, with a small refractive apical ring and tapering paraphyses, but if the anamorph is lacking on the substrate, identification to species is difficult.
Cheers,
Jacques
this could be a number of different things!!
First check if it is not a Chaetosphaeria, with a small refractive apical ring and tapering paraphyses, but if the anamorph is lacking on the substrate, identification to species is difficult.
Cheers,
Jacques
Perz Piotr,
15-05-2007 19:29
Re:Small Pyreno on bark of Salix
Hi Jacques,
I was thinking, that Chaetosphaeria is a single (sub)globose Perithecjum w/o stroma. And here we have a "flat" stroma with a single perithecjum inside.
Pimpek
I was thinking, that Chaetosphaeria is a single (sub)globose Perithecjum w/o stroma. And here we have a "flat" stroma with a single perithecjum inside.
Pimpek
Jacques Fournier,
15-05-2007 19:44
Re:Small Pyreno on bark of Salix
Hi Pimpek,
judging from your last drawing I agree it cannot be a Chaetosphaeria. I have no better idea for the moment....
Cheers,
jacques
judging from your last drawing I agree it cannot be a Chaetosphaeria. I have no better idea for the moment....
Cheers,
jacques